I have recently received some feedback about including sexuality as a topic for dad jokes. Although it was not the most constructive of feedback, some points were made. Sex as a topic is not the same as sexuality, and I apologize for not making that distinction clearer. I was basing my moderating on what was being reported and sex being a topic as understood for children closer to puberty, although sexuality such as LGBTQ+ parents/partners/people can be understood much earlier. While I stand by still keeping actual sexual themes (anatomy, sex positions, etc.) as an off-limits topic for the community, sexuality seems reasonable to include.

This community is not static; I want to do my best to maintain a place that can grow with the community while staying true as a place for humor in a world that has plenty of unpleasant things. I am not a bot, and am indeed a person that is open to having respectful discussions.

Tell me what you think should and should not be included as “off limits topics.” Should profanity be allowed, or possibly only certain words? Are there other suggestions you have? I will try to look at the common themes from any feedback and apply them over the next two weeks or so.

Edit:

To further clarify this post, gayness and the like have never been and will continue not being against community rules. The post in question was removed in error because I am a sleep deprived human and made a mistake about removing a post about sexuality instead of sex. I am apologizing, had already restored the post, and am attempting to make it right.

I originally intended this community to be a place for jokes that can be told to a person of any age, since essentially every other humor source was already geared toward adults. I thought a safe age to draw that line would be five years old. This is where the “clean” and not “adult themes” considerations were made for not including jokes that featured drugs, swearing, and sex. Parenting is a very personal endeavor, and families may choose to talk about sex at age five. Parenting choices and styles are not the purpose of this discussion, and I can understand the visceral reactions people may be feeling, and I’d like to keep this discussion about what to improve about the dadjokes community.

Early in the formation of this community I asked the same question and got all feedback to keep it “all ages friendly.” I’m now seeing some people want to keep it “all ages friendly” and many that want to lift the limitations and simply keep the spirit of the dad jokes. As many of you point out, dad jokes are not limited to younger children or even being dads for that matter.

So far, it looks like the simplest answer would be to do away with c/unclejokes and remove limitations in c/dadjokes about topics for jokes. Is there a compromise for people that want to keep it “all ages friendly,” such as using the NSFW tag for certain posts? Or vice versa, have a tag for “kid friendly” or “safe for all ages”? Or leave it as a “free for all” and let people sift through as they choose? If the majority wants the “free for all,” I suppose there could be a separate community specifically for “jokes for all ages.”

As a reminder, please be respectful of each other. Aggressive comments will be removed.

  • bright@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That’s a lot of verbiage and I still don’t know what you’re talking about. Just give a list of example topics that are ok, and ones that are not ok

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Off limits topics for dadjokes?

    Nothing. It’s dadjokes. Some dads are more crass.

    Ban people being racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and otherwise bigoted. But besides people being shitty, stop promoting puritan ideals and values, they don’t work and are extremely counterproductive and damaging.

    The issue here is that by you removing the joke in question, you yourself have done something bigoted. The same as a police officer breaking the law and hurting somebody. YOU have fucked up.<<<<<

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    If we can’t mention gay marriage, then we must also not speak of straight marriage. If we can’t mention same sex relationships, then we must also forbid references to other relationships as well.

    Are we really worried that five-year-olds are lurking here? Anyone who makes it this far is old enough to handle mentions of gay/straight/bi/poly relationships. Let’s just be pragmatic and draw the line at truly graphic references like any other joke community might.

    • Envidon@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would say that it is fine to moderate for hypothetical five-year-olds, but I think any form of thinking towards anyone needing protectiong from anything but straigh monogamous relations is realy bad.

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    was basing my moderating on what was being reported and sex being a topic as understood for children closer to puberty

    I think you may have some misconceptions about the physical and mental development children.

    Most children begin puberty around 8-9 years old… If you are cutting dad jokes down to topics appropriate for prepubescent children that leaves out the vast majority of the time people raising their kids.

  • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Children are born loving their parents, and should figure out pretty quickly that their parents love each other (sometimes even if they don’t). Understanding the gist of marriage should therefore come pretty naturally to children, whether gay or straight. If they’re perceiving straight marriage as normal and gay marriage as odd, then that’s something they’ve been taught rather than their natural state that needs protecting and preserving until they’re older.

  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just want to throw out as the child of a lesbian couple that I disagree that talking about gay marriage is something that needs to wait until puberty. It certainly didn’t take that long for the other kids at school to notice I had two moms.

    There are even kids books for explaining it, when I was a kid I had Daddy’s Roommate and Heather Has Two Mommies just as a for instance.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a Dad Joke community, it should be oriented toward corny jokes and groan-worthy puns, that only a Dad would love. Don’t tell “Dirty Jokes” here. We know what they are. (didn’t someone make an “uncle jokes” community for those?)

    Having said that, simply noticing that gay and bi people exist (and can also tell dad jokes) in no way qualifies as a “dirty joke”. I mean, we talk with kids about people with boyfriends and girlfriends all the time, and tell corny jokes about them, without getting all ooky. Pointing out a couple with two boyfriends isnt any different.

    I saw that joke and it made me chuckle, if I were mod here I would have left it alone.

    • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the problem is people claiming a joke is “sexual” for mentioning the mere existence of non “traditional” relationships (the joke in no way involving the sexual nature thereof).

      Claiming a joke is “sexual” because it mentions a parent would otherwise make ALL DAD jokes sexual, since being a Dad implies the existence of sex.

      • Pissmidget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Joseph has entered the chat…

        (Completely agree with your point, I just couldn’t help myself… Sorry.)

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    1st off, kudos for taking the feedback and criticism in a constructive manner, instead of getting defensive! Something we see way too little of.

    Tell me what you think should and should not be included as “off limits topics.”

    Lemmy is almost entirely adults. Given our content, I doubt we have any prepubescent kids in our audience. I see no reason for content filters beyond what is required by basic decency and common sense. Beyond that, as long as it fulfils the basic criteria of being a dad joke (groan inducing), let it stand or die on its up (and down) votes.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dad jokes are jokes by dads to make their kids cringe. Not to overstep boundaries. And there nothing wrong with LGBTQ+ themed jokes.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    You don’t have to remove everything that doesn’t exactly fit. Just let the post be if it’s in the gray area

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have recently received some feedback about including sexuality as a topic for dad jokes

    Hi, that was me 👋🏼

    Although it was not the most constructive of feedback

    Sorry about that. Usually my first instinct with a removal I consider unreasonable and where I know who did it is to state my case for reinstatement as calmly and politely as I can in a direct message.

    I have been rebuffed in doing so before, though, (sometimes angrily to the point of being punished for respectfully disagreeing with a moderation decision) and I guess I let bad experiences with less reasonable mods influence my reaction to the point where I assumed the worst, which wasn’t really fair towards you. My apologies.

    sex as a topic is not the same as sexuality

    True.

    I was basing my moderating on what was being reported

    While in essence that’s a good way to do it, sometimes that can be a form of peer pressure from people trying to enforce their opinion rather than the broader community making itself heard.

    I’m sure you know that, though, since you didn’t start moderating recently and sound reasonable, so this is more of a reminder for others in the discussion and no condescension or lecturing you about your “job” is intended.

    sex being a topic as understood for children closer to puberty, although sexuality such as LGBTQ+ parents/partners/people can be understood much earlier.

    This is where your otherwise reasonable argument falls apart, though, as the specific post you removed was clearly the latter and thus within the scope of this community rather than [email protected] or similar.

    While I stand by still keeping actual sexual themes (anatomy, sex positions, etc.) as an off-limits topic for the community

    Personally I disagree on that, but it’s not as important to me as it seems to be to the seeming consensus that agrees, so no worries 🙂

    This community is not static; I want to do my best to maintain a place that can grow with the community while staying true as a place for humor in a world that has plenty of unpleasant things. I am not a bot, and am indeed a person that is open to having respectful discussions

    This is pretty much the perfect attitude to have as the sole mod of a community like this one IMO, good on you!

    Should profanity be allowed

    I’m personally a big fan of profanity used well, but I can see how overuse or misuse could be unfortunate in this particular genre of humor, so I’d consider limiting it justified for once.

    After all, as someone else hinted at, avoiding “bad” words in front of the child is very much part of how literal dads typically talk, so cursing up a storm would be incongruous heh

    I’m still against a total profanity ban, but having common sense “don’t make the joke ABOUT profanity and prurient subject matter” and/or “don’t use it so much that the joke no longer fits the theme” limitations seems reasonable to me.

    I will try to look at the common themes from any feedback and apply them over the next two weeks or so.

    Thanks for being fair and reasonable about it and once again sorry for assuming that you wouldn’t!

  • Aaron@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dads can have children of all ages, even adult children. I see dad jokes as something that produces a groan but also a chuckle, heavily reliant on puns and broken expectations, not something that is directed at little children, but maybe not raunchy for the sake of shock value. That would be an uncle joke.

    I’m happy to see profanity, sex as a topic, etc included.

    Thanks for re-evaluating your decision.

  • boydster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    A joke acknowledging the existence of gay and bi people is not “unclean” or somehow unreasonable to tell in the company of people of any age. That joke made in the style of “Hi Hungry, I’m Dad!” absolutely belongs in the Dad Jokes community.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Assume good faith. They can think the joke violates community rules without being homophobic. I’m kind of on the fence myself.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          The rule is (emphasis mine):

          If you cannot tell this joke to a 5-year-old and they can understand, you probably shouldn’t post it here.

          Yes, you can tell this joke to a 5-year-old, but would they be able to understand? Some might, but I think >95% of 5-year-olds would not understand this joke. That’s why, on paper, it’s a violation of community rules, perhaps subject to one’s interpretation.

          Reporting that something is a violation of community rules is not the same as disliking or hating something. If I see a really funny joke on a “Programmer Humor” community but it has nothing to do with programming, I might still report it because it doesn’t fit that community. Doesn’t mean I hate the joke. And if the non-programming joke involved LGBTQ+, you’d still call me bigoted for it.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Copying from my response to the other reply:

          The rule is (emphasis mine):

          If you cannot tell this joke to a 5-year-old and they can understand, you probably shouldn’t post it here.

          Yes, you can tell this joke to a 5-year-old, but would they be able to understand? Some might, but I think >95% of 5-year-olds would not understand this joke. That’s why, on paper, it’s a violation of community rules, perhaps subject to one’s interpretation.

          Reporting that something is a violation of community rules is not the same as disliking or hating something. If I see a really funny joke on a “Programmer Humor” community but it has nothing to do with programming, I might still report it because it doesn’t fit that community. Doesn’t mean I hate the joke. And if the non-programming joke involved LGBTQ+, [ayyy] would still call me bigoted for it.

          FWIW I am not the one who reported that post, and I don’t think I would have, but I don’t see any grounds for calling them “homophobic monsters”.

          • velma@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Thinking that kids can’t understand gay people existing is homophobic whether the person who reported it is conscious of their bias or not.

            • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I guess that depends on your interpretation of “can understand”. The joke in question was:

              I’m gay and my husband’s bi and there’s nothing he loves more than when people ask if he’s gay and he gets to say “I’m not gay but my husband is”

              To understand this joke, you have to understand:

              1. what ‘gay’ is
              2. what ‘bi’ is
              3. that someone who is bi is not gay, e.g. someone can describe bi as “both gay and straight”, which is an easy explanation that gets most of the point across, like you’d explain to a 5-year-old, but doesn’t fit this joke
              4. how to do the mental arithmetic of who’s saying what - OP is talking about his husband, who enjoys saying something about himself and his husband… It even gave me pause, it’s hard to follow
              5. what the joke is, after having gone through all the above, and understand that this is a fun (and uncommon!) way of expressing it

              that’s a heck of a lot to expect from a 5 year old.

              • velma@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                My 5 year old knew I was bisexual then. He understood that his grandfathers are gay. Pretending like gay people’s existence is confusing for children is homophobic.

                • funkreddit@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Eew why would a 5 year old know anything about sexual preferences nevertheless anything sex related? You have to be a troll or bot or both. Normal people don’t think these things are normal. A 5 year old??? How would that even come up?