A Trump-appointed judge also said Americans have no “constitutional right to truthful information” during a public health crisis.

On Friday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit against the city of Jackson, Mississippi, which alleged the city knowingly let residents drink lead-contaminated water.

The lawsuit, first filed in 2022, says the contamination violated Jacksonians’ constitutional right to bodily integrity. Donald Trump-appointed judge Kurt Engelhardt disagreed. “The Constitution does not provide redress for every governmental wrongdoing,” Engelhardt said.

“Defendants’ actions allegedly deprived Plaintiffs of clean water and guileless information. These deprivations, while grievous, do not infringe upon any deeply rooted constitutional right.”

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not sure why I have to be the person in this thread to explain basic civics to everyone, but “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” is from the Declaration of Independence, it is not in the US Constitution.

    The Declaration is not law, it was just a declaration. You can’t cite it like this, that’s not how it works.

    • cyberfae@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s actually in section 1 of the 14th amendment:

      All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Look, I’m not going to defend this bullshit decision, but humans survived millennia without regulated, clean, drinking water. Yes, some of the lucky ones had life, liberty, and maybe even some property.

            They were drinking low % beer because it was safer. For literally thousands of years.

            It was an absolute nightmare, and anyone with a working understanding of history knows exactly why we need regulated, clean, drinking water.

            But unfortunately, here we are. A legislature that has abdicated it’s responsibility in prostrate to a mad king. With a Supreme Court with at least four justices, off the top of my head, that will have no issue poisoning our drinking water. And two more who could go either way.

            • cyberfae@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              The problem here is that things like beer will protect you from water born disease, but it will not offer any protection against lead, mercury, and many other heavy metals. Many of these pollutants are either new, or never occurred in as significant amounts as they do now. Also our world is getting hotter, and as a result, dehydration will become even more dangerous than before. The last thing you will want to drink during a heatwave is alcohol, even in small quantities. If you’re unlucky like me and can’t have alcohol, are especially sensitive to some of these metals, and dehydrate especially easily, then you’re royally screwed.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Yeah absolutely… We’ve gone so long without having to worry about sooooo much water-borne shit, that people don’t even realize.

                Can’t wait for the mainstream return of dysentery and cholera