There is not right to view porn. Maybe making it, yes. Although SCOTUS has notably never defined obscenity in terms of porn. And that is as drastic oversimplification of the Ashcroft case.

Not sure you got my point though. Starbucks has a supplier. They need to be on the same schedule as their supplier for deliveries to work. And that supplier supplies numerous other businesses.

???

Porn is protected speech?

That’s just not how businesses work. We need times to be consistent so that shipping, etc all works.

It was really pushed by Rubio before he boarded the Trump train though

Why? There is literally no argument for changing. It was proposed originally in a work of SATIRE by Benjamin Franklin. The US adopted a policy out of a satirical work

Hemp legalization? The thing at risk in this year’s farm bill?

It’s actually been gaining steam over the past 5-ish years. If it dies in the end, it’s because people can’t agree which time should be permanent.

But this is the biggest sticking point. If you talk to experts, everyone agrees this is fucking stupid. The divide is over which way to go.

This originally gained steam in the senate maybe 6 years ago? Shocked it is still kicking

Oh nice, the one good thing Marco Rubio ever stood up for has stayed a thing beyond his Senate term

Wu Tang did NFTs? That’s hilarious and sad

Edit: would be a lot funnier if there were Wu Tang NFTs

California?

Also, Woods wasn’t illegally smuggling it through his campaign funds