• Sibshops@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Technically it is, no? Socialism is community ownership of the means of production which includes labor. And that can arguably be extended to socialized services for labor such has healthcare, public transportation, and grocery stores.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Social democracy is not socialism by any metric, socialism starts at ownership of the means of production by workers, and a state that works for the proletariat and not capitalists. That’s the starting point, from there you can then add whatever social programs on top, but if you don’t start from there you’re still in a bourgeois democracy

      • Sibshops@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I disagree, socialist institutions or services can still exist within a capitalist government, even if it is piecemeal. There doesn’t have to be a threshhold to pass for some aspect to be considered socialism.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          To expand upon you: examples of such institutions or policies would be free healthcare, universal basic income, but also places like libraries. You could even call (financial) support for housing & children, as well as progressive taxes socialist - despite the system in which they exist being capitalist.