A disruptive passenger was restrained with flexible handcuffs and duct-taped to a seat as his flight was diverted to make an emergency landing in Baltimore Thursday night, photos and video from other passengers showed.

Richard Olenick and Juan Mejia were more than halfway through the flight when a man two rows behind them in the first-class section started to become belligerent, Olenick said.

A flight attendant tried to control the situation but the man got increasingly agitated, started to hit the passenger next to him and then hit a woman who tried to intervene, Olenick said.

  • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why? So people who live thousands of miles away can see a headline, dox them, then harass their family based on assumptions for years?

    You have no idea why this happened, or what the situation around it is. You have no reason to judge and punish this person.

    • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s fair. But when you’re arrested on suspicion of committing a crime, your identity is made public. I guess I’m more wondering why this guy’s name and image are withheld in this instance.

        • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Which is where I am and where this happened and where the article is being published, sooo… I guess my question still stands?

          • Manjushri@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Probably because the news service doesn’t want to potentially get sued. The same reason they often use ‘allegedly’ when talking about people accused of crimes.

            Also, though they do it here in the states, it’s still wrong to release the names and images of people accused of crimes. People should not have their name and face plastered across the internet merely because they’ve been accused. Being accused of a crime is not the same as being convicted of a crime. Why should someone have their life potentially ruined because they are accused of something. Lots of people are wrongly accused and never convicted. We should at least wait until a conviction before publishing such information.

          • deltapi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            well we do it here in America, so you know it’s the right thing to do

            …how’s that going for you these days?

            • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              On the list of things wrong here, I’m not sure “posting photo of what someone does in public” even ranks.

              • deltapi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s part of the problem. You’ve come to accept so many small compromises on your rights that you have the situation that you have now.