I would partially disagree with that. I just don’t think you have enough people willing to join you yet. I’d argue that you’re better off telling people to join whatever their closest mutual aid group or even leftist militia group then trying to find people over the internet to do violence with you, especially because anyone here could be trying to push you to do crimes for multiple nefarious purposes.
For the most part, I feel like the people trying to tell people to do crimes they are not doing on here do not fundamentally have anyone’s best interests at heart. So, I’ll apologize for being antagonistic.
Friend you nailed it in the first half and then dropped it. The idea here is to create various groups through the spread of ideas, a singular leader would just be taken out and possibly replaced. The best thing that could happen is multiple spontaneous cells being grown throughout the U.S… There aren’t enough people ready, for this which is why the ideas have to spread both online and IRL, which I do in both spaces. Whether they join their local militia, or create their own from likeminded individuals is what I’ve been trying to encourage without using the word “militia” since I find many are allergic to the label thanks to right-winged chuds.
Before ideas can become group action, they must be spread through words. Those are literally the foundation for any organizing that follows. So yeah I find your kind of rhetoric far more harmful because it essentially defends the status quo, and encourages people to continue taking abuse. Abusers love it when their targets don’t fight back, and back off once they do. In fact the only way to make them understand to back off is to use their “language” against them. Feel free to ask how I know from personal experience.
I would partially disagree with that. I just don’t think you have enough people willing to join you yet. I’d argue that you’re better off telling people to join whatever their closest mutual aid group or even leftist militia group then trying to find people over the internet to do violence with you, especially because anyone here could be trying to push you to do crimes for multiple nefarious purposes.
For the most part, I feel like the people trying to tell people to do crimes they are not doing on here do not fundamentally have anyone’s best interests at heart. So, I’ll apologize for being antagonistic.
Friend you nailed it in the first half and then dropped it. The idea here is to create various groups through the spread of ideas, a singular leader would just be taken out and possibly replaced. The best thing that could happen is multiple spontaneous cells being grown throughout the U.S… There aren’t enough people ready, for this which is why the ideas have to spread both online and IRL, which I do in both spaces. Whether they join their local militia, or create their own from likeminded individuals is what I’ve been trying to encourage without using the word “militia” since I find many are allergic to the label thanks to right-winged chuds.
Before ideas can become group action, they must be spread through words. Those are literally the foundation for any organizing that follows. So yeah I find your kind of rhetoric far more harmful because it essentially defends the status quo, and encourages people to continue taking abuse. Abusers love it when their targets don’t fight back, and back off once they do. In fact the only way to make them understand to back off is to use their “language” against them. Feel free to ask how I know from personal experience.