• frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Dangerous? Like stealing mass amounts of intellectual property dangerous? Or polluting the environment to profit off said stealing?

  • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Best take on this I read was:

    “McDonald’s CEO demands ban of burgers cooked at home.”

      • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        You must be very young. Perhaps like many AI bubble boosters you were born yesterday.

        • AshMan85@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          One, im older then you. Two, you are painfully obvious that you have no clue the Pentagon wanted to use anthropic in drones and be fully autonomous to decide who they fire apon, with no human oversight. So, why dont you explain how the fuck your comparison is even relevant.

          • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Hello, Older-Than-You. I’m Dad.

            Uhh, I was a silly comparison alluding to how Anthropic is making spurious arguments about its “dangerous” competitors while also being very convenient to its business interests. Others were amused. I’m sorry you weren’t. Can’t please everybody.

            • AshMan85@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              My dad is not as dumb as you. Once again, anthropic is warning what government wants to do with Ai while being against. You are having trouble understanding that, son.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    And the CEO of anthropic should be on the board of deciding what AI constitutes a danger. We all know how this goes.

  • Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    No doubt they will add that their competition especially the open source ai is dangerous. They have been lobbying against local open source ai for a while so it’s not a surprise

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I agree.

    Also. because of the way they work and how people use them as a source of information, all LLMs are dangerous.

  • Abyssian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Please, no. The way things have been going the last several years AI somehow wiping humanity out actually seems like one of the best possible futures this timeline can reach.

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    I swear these ai ceos are one trick ponies. again with this marketing of doom and gloom Anthrophic? really?

  • luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Quick question, does “dangerous” include “known to ignore instructions, creatively circumvent guardrails and find security loopholes around restricted permissions”?

    Actually, never mind, I can guess the answer and I won’t like it.