I respect the effort someone put into making that acronym. That must be a fun job.

Oh shit, was halfway through when they mentioned being in EU. Don’t think it could happen (legally) in my country because we’ve got a privacy agency that’s quite older than GDPR (and one of its precursors). But it’s worrying.

If we’re counting training material and the environmental cost they’re passing onto everyone else, also stolen money.

AI detection by AI is not reliable. Lots of false negatives, and comparatively less but still too much reporting false positives to be reliable (and those are especially biased).

It’s unlikely to get better too. If AI was able to reliably detect AI output, why not use that to correct itself to be less AI-like? And where is the seemingly infinite money thrown at in this struggle?

Nobody holds a phone that way unless they are filming or taking pics, and if someone do that constantly with no clear intention, people around are probably going to feel discomfort.

deleted by creator

Of all the things I had to change on my switch (1), I had to do a joy con battery once. It was annoying because the only third party battery I could find was like one millimeter wider and was a pain to insert.

Mostly my repairs were loads of sticks and joy con rails. Once i had to change the switch fan that started to fail too. Also the shitty plastic on the backplate started to crack and I replaced it too.

I even replaced the sd card slot, but I think I didn’t need to do that in the end. I had read errors that were due to software and I “just” needed to transfer my games to the system memory and back to the SD again. Weird stuff.

Haven’t needed to repair anything on the 2 yet. I hope it’s a bit more reliable.

I agree.

Also. because of the way they work and how people use them as a source of information, all LLMs are dangerous.

The article says they’re supposed to be an alternative to fully robotic devices, with lower power consumption since their movement is… bug-powered I guess, but I am really curious what kind of fine control you can have on a cockroach.

I mean, today a lot of people are anti-genAi just because they had enough of it making everything worse (including technology), while also being an environmental disaster, and yet there are always assholes to accuse them of being “anti-technology”.

To be fair some real flowers lookk very weird, but those fake ones look like muppets.

I hope one day we can look back and say “that’s crazy, back then it was worth it organizing a heist just for a little RAM” like we do with those silly DVD players.

I would appreciate gen AI being even better at killing itself.

That data says about half the user base is not what you say it is.

Largest share 25-34, 18-24 in very close third place, making 18-34 about 42%. Also, general usage still expected to grow (somehow), so it’s not just old people staying there forever.

34 in 2025 is millenial but not even older millenial.

Not in the US, but I’d go even further and ban any ad mimicking an “alerting” kind of sound, especially starting with it.

Alarms, ringtones, even loud door knocking. Even worse, traffic sounds with car horns (rare, but some still do this shit somehow). I can’t believe some of the ads I get are still legal, deliberately stressing you to get your attention shouldn’t be.

Is there a scenario in which they both lose? I’ll take that.