While younger generations are drinking less, adults aged 50 to 64 are drinking more, causing a shift reshaping the US bar scene

Alcohol consumption has decreased across the United States in recent years, particularly among adults under age 40, but there is one older demographic in which more people are drinking than before the Covid-19 pandemic – and more are doing so heavily, according to a new study.

For the first time since before the pandemic, the percentage of US adults who drink any alcohol decreased between 2022 and 2024, according to the report in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine. People from 50 to 64, which roughly corresponds with gen X, were the only age group in which drinking continued to increase.

They are likely hurting their health by imbibing, according to the latest science, but they are also helping keep open bars. Such businesses have struggled as younger generations, the drivers of nightlife, move away from booze.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yeah now you are starting to troll. Click on the link. Read what I have written before the link.

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’m not. Just debating it.

      Much earlier, alcohol has already been assigned to the highest class of carcinogenic substances, class 1. It sits in the same class as radiation, tobacco and asbestos.

      Tobacco contains about 250 carcinogens when combusted, that’s way more harmful than alcohol.

      They may be in the same class, but the risk profile is much lower for alcohol. The most common is colorectal cancer, and the risks are minimal

      For every 1,000 heavy drinkers over a lifetime, roughly 11 additional cases of colorectal cancer would be expected compared to 1,000 non-drinkers

      • riverdoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think this is a good example of risk through the lens of policy versus risk through the lens of personal choices.

        There is no safe amount of alcohol when it comes to a government recommending the use of a substance. The decision to say “one glass a day” by the government has been shown to lead to adverse health outcomes in the population.

        You are speaking to the chance that a single individual will experience adverse health outcomes from choosing for themselves to have a glass a day. You are probably right that on an individual basis it is a reasonable risk to take (though I don’t know what the exact numbers suggest).

        People often confuse policy level risk assessments with individual risk assessments, without considering the law of large numbers, and how a policy maker must make decisions for the population, not an individual.

        • DegradationDenial@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Counter: Bars should have taxes lifted on the first round of beverages purchased in bars. And increased taxes for alcohol purchased in shops. And maximum music dB enforced.

          In the current time of AI, music by bands should be required.

          Social drinking should be promoted to counter loneliness.