• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    Wait until critizism of The Glorious Party and Our Beloved Supreme Leader is considered “piracy”.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Motherfucker, I used to have a vaporwave looken one of this due to a decoding error on an old phone and was going to post it but now I can’t find the sombitch. Fack.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Actually they (Republicans) love the government, specifically because it pays them money to pass corporate protectionism bills. Remember, when Republicans take over and lock out the Democrats, then:
      ~ They no longer need Republican votes, so officials no longer have to serve their constituents
      ~ The Executive no longer needs Congress, so their money train is in jeopardy. ~ The businesses no longer need lobbyists, so their money train is in jeopardy.

      (Considering the level of incompetence we’ve seen in the federal government lately, it’s possible that our congresscritters haven’t fully thought this through.)

      We’re in the AI age now, which has shown us IP laws mean nothing when an entire major industry wants to violate them. This has always been true, as the studios and record labels pirated all the time, but it wasn’t as open and in the sunlight as it is with AI development. And Big AI is currently propping up the entire stock market.

      It turns out IP laws never meant anything anyway. Copyrights and patents were justified as temporary monopolies to promote science and the useful arts, specifically to produce a robust public domain.

      Except it does neither. Artists and scientists are rarely the copyright holders, and to get to own their own stuff, they need to be hot property (still making content) and have good lawyers. Also, the temporary monopolies have become permanent in practice. (much thanks to Walt Disney.) SCOTUS has not only refused to see the public as a stakeholder, but has taken things out of the public domain, so it has to be licensed again, in defiance of the Constitution of the United States.

      So now IP law is only a rent-seeking racket. Especially now since you need subscriptions to use your appliances.

      But as Sony has made clear for us in 2026, if purchasing isn’t owning, then piracy isn’t a copyright violation.

      This bill is a technology solution and has technology countermeasures. They can order ISPs DNSes and VPNs to block piracy sites, but those sites change all the time, and can do so faster than it takes to update the registries. Furthermore, when services don’t follow through, they will get more usage (and will make more money) so there’s a perverse incentive to slow walk the updates, and not talk to whoever makes the lists.

      We learned this a long time ago when the biggest selling point of ISPs was free porn and free movies.

      Like encryption with backdoors for law enforcement, there’s no way to nerd harder to make it work.

      It also depends on foreign service offerings cooperating with US law. Unless we build the Great Firewall of the US (which, I’m sure, is on the table), US offerings will be obligated to follow the law while foreign ones do not, which will run against the interests of local businesses.

  • CalemitousVariantK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Meta, X, and ChatGPT have all automated mass piracy of art, music, articles, and anything their genAI touches. Surely you mean to start there?

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    An who decides what is piracy? The facists? This is a bad idea.

    • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I tested I2P a number of years ago and havent messed with it since. Been wanting to get back into setting it up for torrenting on my server. Will have to do some research and set it back up this weekend. Nows a better time than any I guess. Thanks for the reminder to start again.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I tried it again recently as a comparison to Tor and I much prefer the “everyone is a node” system + full TCP and UDP support, but the main downside is throughput/bandwidth.

        It’s excellent if you’ve got time but I wish they would bump the default node share limits so thst the network runs faster.

        • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, I do know its alot slower. I at least want to get it set up as a fallback if this bullshit the governments are doing actually happens.

  • Malica@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Oh we’re voting on shit again? Let’s vote on Kegsbreath’s impeachment then.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We know they think corporations are people, but they’re not the only people they should be serving.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m afraid SCOTUS believes you are wrong, which is why it’s so open to rolling back human rights, and hobbling regulatory bodies so that corporations can violate rights with impunity.

  • FearfulSalad@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’d really be nice if “Huh. This protects corporate interests more than taxpayer interests. Denied.” was a thing in government.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Right now, legal wonks are considering the necessity of abolishing or tightly regulating judicial review. While we’re used to SCOTUS copaganda, e.g. Brown v. Board of Education or Roe v. Wade there are a whole lot more Dred Scott v. Sandfords in history. Citizens United v. FEC, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and Louisiana v. Callais are only a few recent examples. SCOTUS has typically sided against human civil rights and for business property rights ever since Marbury v. Madison.

      It turns out that most of our evolved civil liberties were passed through politics (id est, through Congress and signed by the President. And SCOTUS often struck them down, so it had to be done multiple times.

      Getting the Democratic party to overhaul the Supreme Court (and potentially the entire federal court system) is another story, and may require public pressure, but it’s a critical step if we’re going to try to make the US democratic and public-serving.

      If we don’t, If we don’t uncapture SCOTUS and then ironclad it so it doesn’t get captured again, then we’ll be right back where we are now, and next time the US might become a one party autocracy.

      To be fair, we may not make it this time. It’s like the goblin army at Minas Tirith, a lot of things have to go right in succession if the US is to become a public-serving liberal democracy.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Piracy keeps the poors occupied and busy so they don’t riot. There’s no blood left to squeeze from that rock, they’re not going to buy streaming. Games are in decline as systems die of go outdated, and corporate erodes the quality of development.

    They’re idiots if they push this bill in earnest.

    Look what happened the last time people had too much time on their hands (Covid). And everyone has a lot more to pissed about, now.

    • mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Your last paragraph crossed my mind recently as the oil prices really start to spiral out of control. There were so many protests bordering on riots because people were stuck at home due to covid - now we’re already hearing news that truckers are starting to sit idle instead of driving at a loss.

      Imagine how much free time and how much anger everyone will have when the economy grinds to a halt from product shortages all over the country.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’d love to think people would’ve protested racism and gross police incompetencies ending in death regardless, but it’s highly unlikely.

        Even the storming of the Bastille had to wait for nice weather.

        Locking away the poors’ access to distraction could very well be that “nice weather”.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’ve heard plenty of times in the past that truckers will strike over this or that, and I’d like to actually see it happen. It would stop everything in three days or so.

          Usually what happens is we get a couple of videos of truckers going slow and blocking the highway, but not much else.