

Laws require people to enforce them. Otherwise they are just ink on a page. If the people that have been tasked with enforcement are the ones breaking the law…


Laws require people to enforce them. Otherwise they are just ink on a page. If the people that have been tasked with enforcement are the ones breaking the law…


Can it do things on its own whim without any human interaction? No? Then not sentient. Get over yourself and realize LLMs are hitting your internal Turing Test.


Holy passive language headline Batman


I think the supposed logic is that if you average everyone’s predictions together you’ll be pretty close to accurate. Similar to how a crowd of people sing with near perfect pitch even though any individual in that crowd isn’t. However, this runs head first into Goodhart’s Law and immediately falls apart


I guess it depends on how you define “kinda close” since the Constitution didn’t start getting drafted until a decade later


It’s like blanket rules against felons. A felony ranges pretty significantly from trying to pass a bad check all the way to murder. Being a “registered sex offender” could just mean that the person tried to patron a sex worker, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they committed a violent or egregious offense.
Both LG and Microsoft share responsibility. LG for doing it and Microsoft for allowing it.