WSJ editorial board are basically an anti-progress FUD campaign committee and always have been. They spent the entirety of Bill de Blasio’s (Second best NYC mayor in my life) double term desperately trying to tear him down, too. They’re also the origin of the term “bike lobby” or more specifically “The all-powerful bike lobby” in reference to an imaginary and shady organization supposedly responsible for getting share bikes and bike lanes onto the street. WSJ is a rag.
WSJ is so desperate to be relevant again they are straight up printing obvious lies.
It is the Murdock way
WSJ editorial board are basically an anti-progress FUD campaign committee and always have been. They spent the entirety of Bill de Blasio’s (Second best NYC mayor in my life) double term desperately trying to tear him down, too. They’re also the origin of the term “bike lobby” or more specifically “The all-powerful bike lobby” in reference to an imaginary and shady organization supposedly responsible for getting share bikes and bike lanes onto the street. WSJ is a rag.