• Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The term “5 nm” does not indicate that any physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors is five nanometers in size. Historically, the number used in the name of a technology node represented the gate length, but it started deviating from the actual length to smaller numbers (by Intel) around 2011.[3] According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, the 5 nm node is expected to have a gate length of 18 nm, a contacted gate pitch of 51 nm, and a tightest metal pitch of 30 nm.[4] In real world commercial practice, “5 nm” is used primarily as a marketing term by individual microchip manufacturers to refer to a new, improved generation of silicon semiconductor chips in terms of increased transistor density (i.e. a higher degree of miniaturization), increased speed and reduced power consumption compared to the previous 7 nm process.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_nm_process

    I agree that there should be a better way to describe these things. Why not describe the actual size like we used to. Quite strange.

    • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because while they weren’t shrinking in that aspect, other things were shrinking.

      Its similar to how BMW decoupled their model numbers from displacement quite some time ago. Its where it sits in “the ranking”.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mercedes too. An E300 used to have 300cm³ of displacement.

        Still it’s better this way. People demanding huge displacement values for no fucking reason when technology has long moved on are among the dumbest on the planet.