• BozzyBuzzard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Sometimes I forget folks have to deal with ads in streaming. Those were NOT the days 🏴‍☠️🦜 🌊

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is a good thing if it’s implemented properly.

    Explanation: A TV show or movie needs a lot of range in volume: car crashes are supposed to be louder than normal conversation etc.

    A commercial can and usually does employ a technicque called compression to make all parts of it as loud as possible without distortion.

    Now if the thus treated commercial is as loud as the loudest bits in the show/movie, it’s still too loud.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It is a good thing, except broadcast television had the same implemented and they claimed it wasn’t louder than the programming when it was.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’ll use the cable TV argument, they’re not turning the volume up they’re increasing the amplitude.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I mean there was a law passed for TV promising the same thing, and if you watch broadcast TV the commercials are still way louder.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have my doubts. the ad markets are fairly regional and audio normalization at that scale is going to require a bit more processing power to do.

        I do agree that normally what the state does trickles to everyone else but, in this case it’s going to be more cost effective to only have the extra processing expense in CA, as they can’t use the same audio normalized ads across the market.

        Being said, if this catches on and it becomes a federal thing like how TV broadcast is, I wouldn’t be sad that’s for sure.

        • Mereo@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          In this case, however, we’re talking about streaming platforms, which are pretty much universal across state lines.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Advertisements on streaming platforms are not universal across state lines though, the ads on them are localized to your locations.

            Adverts as a whole are very location based as locations differ in what types of ads are efficient in that area, what people want and like to see in CA vs what people want and like to see in MA for example are vastly different, and as such you will get different adverts.

            There is no incentive for them to just normalize all adverts on their platform, as that will take up more processing power and time and as such more money to do. As such it’s more likely they will just make a separate streaming pipeline that normalizes only ads in the CA pipeline and call it good.