• _chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Oh and don’t worry, if ICE vehicles go away, the politicians will find some way to levy an 8/9ths tax on something else to make up for not having those fuel sales.

    Toll roads for everyone?

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Toll roads for everyone?

      id hope so, currently much of it comes from general revenue and second order costs arent factored in, so for example heath care costs subsidise road use.

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If you think fuel tax is the majority cost of owning a car, you are going to be disappointed. And why shouldn’t car owners pay to maintain the roads? And how do you think that happens? If it isn’t taxes it will likely be tolls.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      We need to figure out how to pay for road upkeep somehow.

      That’s not to say the way gas taxes are allocated to road maintenance now is perfect. Far from it. But on paper (at least where I’m from) that’s how roads are maintained.

      • _chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah, fuel taxes are supposed to pay for that. Given the state of the roads at least here in California, it sure doesn’t look like it happens.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m also in California and would agree. The word “supposed” is doing a lot of work there.

          On the other hand, with so many EVs in California we have to at least consider a part of that is because of the loss of gas tax income.

      • yes_this_time@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Depending on the jurisdiction… Gas taxes go towards externalities largely. Roads are funded through general revenue. Perversely, those who don’t drive subsidize drivers.

        If I could wave a wand that I dont have:

        Gas tax to cover externalities

        Tire tax to cover externalities

        Toll fees to cover usage.

        Reduce income tax and increase social assistance proportionally.

        Obviously that would be impossible to sell, but it would be more fair, and incentive better outcomes.

        • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Sales tax makes sense to cover roads because a lot of the wear and tear on the roads is caused by the trucks that deliver goods. Even if you bike to the store, you are using the roads in that way.

          • yes_this_time@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Cars sitting in the garage have less impact than cars on the road though.

            With tolls you can be more targeted. A road in a city has more cost (land and maintenance) and greater externalities (negatively impacts more people)

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Where im at registration is a factor of 2/4x to make up for the fuel tax. Fun times.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I mean yeah?

        Roads are not free. Fuel was a reasonable proxy for usage previously. Without that it just leaves non drivers to subsidise driving.

        • mesa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Im not disagreeing, it just kinda sucks that im in a VERY low paying with VERY high taxes for our area. In theory that means we should be getting better services. But its quite the opposite.

          • tempest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            True. However as has prices rise the ‘savings’ should increase further such that the tax feels smaller compared to the fuel ‘savings’.

            The other thing to consider is that high weight vehicles, think tractor trailers, but also EVs to an extent, do significantly more damage to the roads they operate on. I wonder if the proliferation of EVs will increase road wear.