Because of what pressing charges in a sexual assault case entails for a victim. Again, look into it.

Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.

It’s actually very common. Look into prosecution of sex crimes. It’s illuminating. And maddening.

After the previous screed, I don’t think I have anything to talk about with you.

Jeez, talk about a mask off moment.

Let’s vote the for the Abu Ghraib mercenary with the Nazi tattoo in the name of non-white people!

Can you hear yourself?

Downplaying actual rape is beyond the pale, but you don’t stop there! Oh no!

That’s for sure, but I would not be happy if “better than the republicans” is the standard.

Also, we really owe a debt of gratitude to the women that came forward, at great personal cost. It shouldn’t have come that far.

Intolerant of rape? Proudly so.

Judgmental about rapists? Double proudly so.

And that’s above and beyond my intolerance and judgment of Nazi tattooed abu ghraib mercenaries.

He can go grow up somewhere else than in the US senate.

And I assure you the feeling is completely mutual. You are a putrid specimen of humanity. I hope, for their sake, people pick the bear.

You certainly haven’t shown any.

Because they pick rapists? Yeah, that’s a serious problem.

It’s that old chestnut about the markets staying irrational longer than you can stay solvent. Nobody wants the music to stop, and there is still a lot of money out there that they can burn through.

Honestly I’m not holding my breath, this could go on for years. Of course, every day that passes the hole gets deeper.

What facts? That testimony corroborated by contemporaneous documentary evidence is admissible? I was hoping you could figure that one out completely on under your own power given the context of the discussion. But I see now that I have severely overestimated you.

And yes, that’s name calling. And you deserved it.

What do you mean there is no evidence?

First of all, this is not a criminal proceeding. There is no admissibility standard or reasonable doubt standard.

Second, based on the description of the evidence, most of it would definitely be admissible and probative. Of course, sexual violence hardly gets investigated so it’s a moot point.

In other words, you have no idea what you are taking about.

To be fair, there’s no good time to be accused of being a gross fucking rapist.

The best option is not to be a gross fucking rapist.

And then people wonder why women pick the bear.

I’m getting inundated with chuds “just asking questions” and you got caught in the crossfire. I’m really sorry.

You’re a bright guy, I’m sure you can track down the biggest political story of the last 24 hours all by your lonesome.

I mean, between the “ai will replace workers” and “we can just buy stuff with money loaned against stock valuation, we don’t need customers”, this bubble is looking like the perfect self licking ice cream.

Dems threw away the opportunity to pick up senate seat by picking walking red flag collection of a candidate who turned out to be even worse than everyone’s already severely lowered expectations.

Hey man, pick bad candidates, get stupid prizes.