Public companies must be penny pinching

Private companies have the choice not to be

You can ONLY radiate heat in space…

Yes, investing in reliability will increase reliability

You can radiate the heat with a biiiig long radiator but it doesn’t solve any of the other problems or improve commercial scalability

Yet Microsoft abandoned the idea because it was so fraught with commercialisation issues. Which is exactly what the experts are saying

Can’t maintain, can’t upgrade, can’t repair, it pollutes the environment with abandoned shit and it doesn’t scale

Reliability probably went up because of the extra expense put into making sure it won’t immediately fail and need to be repaired

What did they do to gamers

Not a public company, makes big difference

Is there any case where this is currently unclear? Which part needs to be debated?

You really don’t think there could be a possibility of a horrific consequence if AI is given the responsibility of managing real world systems?

The coordinated us attacks on anthropic are apparent

In article it says the probrem was staff resignations, not AI. They brought them back with more money to set up the AI systems.

CI/CD is overflowing as the bottleneck for us, and AI isn’t making running tests faster. It’s making it slower, with more (truly good, useful, productive) unit tests and product features added every day than human teams could

But that adds a square increase on CI/CD time and load… And what do you do while waiting for your test run? Make and submit more PRs of course!

I disagree with the premise. Never blindly trust a piece of code, document or statement written by a human or AI.

You weren’t reviewing properly before. You were slack. You let problems through. Now you have to review properly and oh no it’s slower than just clicking approve

Nailed it

Old/current ram or new ram? Probably be moving on to DDR6 then

Nah they’re saying the like 3 places that manufacture RAM won’t drop their prices after

Machines cannot take responsibility for problems, which is why I feel containment barriers cannot be entirely AI. AI reviews are fine (and catch a lot of wild issues humans miss) if a human genuinely reviews it too

I’ve lost count of how many snippets I’ve reviewed that were verbatim pasted from stack overflow pre-AI lol

My view is that humans produce a lot of garbage, and AI tooling currently amplifies your productivity. If you’re careless, don’t take pride and normally commit tech debt then with AI tooling that’s going to be amplified 10-100x. The more careless you are the faster you can commit more garbage - especially if you’re skipping on unit/integration/functional testing

Again, cowboys have been skipping steps and doing things lazily and poorly well before AI. Everyone knows people who jump straight into an IDE instead of following proper workflows. Yes, skills you don’t practice take a hit. In a professional setting there is such a substantial productivity hit to avoid all AI use, compared to correct and proper use. It will soon be infeasible to take such at anti AI stance and remain in the industry

The lazy part is not questioning the bullshit they noticed and did nothing about - not using the tool

How do bench seats kill people?