To be clear, I didn’t post the image.

Why “should” people use Photoshop to make this image, instead of generative AI?

Well, that’s a different take than the one I responded to. You seem focused on age limits, which are not the same as term limits.

As the other person noted, term limits won’t keep old people from being elected, if they’re old when they’re first elected.

Not that they both can’t be problems worth addressing, but we should take care to define what it is we’re trying to solve, and solve it as directly as possible.

Fake internet points don’t affect my decision-making or emotional state. lol

I don’t recall asking you to. I’m not confident you’d even be up for the task, to be honest.

Term limits are a double edged sword. You lose experience when you kick people out just because they have experience, not to mention taking away voter choice.

It might be better to limit consecutive terms to a low number, based on the length of the term of office. For example, no more than 2 consecutive terms as a US Senator, or something.

I agree with you that there’s a problem that needs solving.

At no time did I indicate I didn’t understand consent. I only ever questioned your made up personal definition of sex. lol

I was wondering how long it would take for you to imply disagreeing with you meant I was confused about consent. You did it everywhere else.

I noticed. Maybe that would have been a good place to start?

So, if you’re not using the dictionary definition, which does not imply consent, why are you pretending it does imply consent? Better, what makes you feel justified in claiming someone is wrong for using a dictionary definition, instead of your seemingly made up personal definition?

Well, a quick look at a dictionary doesn’t support this definition you’re using, but it does maybe provide me a path to showing you where I’m coming from. The relevant definition I have here is “sexual intercourse”. Are you saying that consent is implied in that definition? If yes, which word is providing that implication: “sexual” or “intercourse”?

What are you even talking about? I didn’t “come at you” nor is your semantic argument “defending” anyone lol. I’m trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that you’re not just virtue signalling. I think I’m about done with that now.

The image looks pretty good, tbh. Why are you saying it’s slop?

Please don’t get me wrong, I do think using the word “rape” (when combined with the obligatory “allegedly”) is a better title, and a better way to describe the situation, but I don’t think using “have sex” is wrong or inaccurate, let alone defending anything.

I am pretty sure you’re wrong about this but I’m unsure where you’re pulling this definition from, so maybe that would help sort it out.

In 1530, could a 14 year old “have sex”? Are you leaning on morality to define sex this way, or legality?

To be clear, this semantic argument feels much more like virtue signalling than anything else, but I’m open to be convinced it’s more than that.

So “consensual sex” is a redundant phrase?

Does “have sex” imply consent?

I have an mp3 player that I occasionally use, but much more frequently I’m streaming my music to my phone from my Plex server.