sidenote: why do people still use archive.today and archive.is, even after it tampered with archived snapshots, and used website visitors to DDOS other websites: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today
Why not just use archive.org?
If that’s the case; why use the agent to edit the code in the first place?
Agents for generation, humans for review
Right wingers have used that exact line on me, because they assume all “woke” actions are performative and aren’t based in real beliefs.
Well Paul Graham is not referring to you, since the rest of his quote makes it clear that he is talking about those who don’t engage deeply.
Imo there’s no point in discussing a quote or article if you aren’t going to take it in good faith. If you take the worst interpretation of their words, of course it’s going to be bad.
But if you take Paul Graham’s words at face value, then he’s simply saying that he believes shallow engagement had a large and negative influence on online discourse. That’s all you need to take from that quote.
I never said Paul Graham was a progressive left wing? Also that’s the exact identity politics that I was alluding to. Categorizing people and then making large assumptions on the meaning of their words based on the categorization.
As I mentioned in another comment, “Woke” can simply mean “people who virtue signal but don’t bother to engage with the issues deeply”, and with that definition Paul Graham’s quote makes perfect sense
How do you know what he means by “woke”? I read it as “people who virtue signal and don’t actually care”
Let me translate this bit:
your interpretation, not necessarily what he meant
I disagree, it’s ok for forums to have a focus. Hacker News has always been focused on tech and startups
Another article of Drew Devault grasping straws. For example he picks out this quote when trying to diminish Paul Graham:
Racism, for example, is a genuine problem. Not a problem on the scale that the woke believe it to be, but a genuine one. I don’t think any reasonable person would deny that. The problem with political correctness was not that it focused on marginalized groups, but the shallow, aggressive way in which it did so. Instead of going out into the world and quietly helping members of marginalized groups, the politically correct focused on getting people in trouble for using the wrong words to talk about them.
I literally don’t see what’s wrong with this quote. Paul Graham is referencing identity politics, virtue signaling, and other behaviors that were definitely common before, and are still fairly common today.
Read the article, it’s all covered there. Open source password managers like bitwarden and keepass are ideal, but passkey support and integration with the OS is not there yet. With text passwords, you always had to fallback of copy and paste. With passkeys, OS integration is crucial.
My guess is that it may happen, or the big companies like Google or Apple can keep shifting the standards to keep the open source options outdated, like what Google already does with web standards.
Declarative configuration (like docker compose) is basically “code local, push remote”, and it has a lot of benefits, including improving efficiency because you have a clearer idea of exactly what is set up on the server, to make it easier to debug or make changes.
Contrast this with just sshing in and running a bunch of commands to install something. Then coming back months later and wondering “what files did I touch? what packagea did I install? Hmm dpkg log says I added X but then later I removed it, so was it important?” Etc.
The article is saying that while passkeys could theoretically be better, the current implementation is bad because it cedes power to centralized 3rd parties, entrenching users who now have no way out when that 3rd party is incompetent or corrupt.
When I talk about de-anonymizing the user, I mean that Google Play has already identified the user of the device. Then they can spy on the Signal app to try to identify the Signal account.
But also, regarding ZKP, afaik their ZKP doesn’t account for timing attacks. Signal can log when each account was made, and collude with Google to figure out which payments correspond to which accounts
Fair enough, I see what you mean now. This is more of a progress report than a project release. Sorry for the misunderstanding. FWIW I think your project is cool regardless of whether you used AI or not, so great work!
P.S. Out of curiosity I did read a bit of your comment history and I do agree with your comments w.r.t privacy and AI disclosure. It is a tricky problem indeed.
If it’s not made with AI you can use the CBH tag
Have you heard of Tube Archivist?
Edit: ok i see you mentioned it in your Local Smarttube announcement post. Why doesn’t Tube Archivist fit your needs?
I believe you need AI disclosure to post in this sub. Check the sidebar rules.
Yup they have their own crypto but they won’t accept it for creating accounts.
if you exchange from some other currency
Exactly. I can see why they probably won’t accept Monero for regulatory reasons, but just accept bitcoin so I can use a swap and pay with my monero
“That’s next” given that it took them years to make phone # optional, I’m not optimistic that this will happen anytime soon. Not to mention their current payment method requires play services, which has probably already de-anonymized the user
If Google and Signal collude can they link payments to accounts via timing attacks? My guess is yes
From the official announcement
Can I buy an account on a device that has no Play Services?
Not yet. We have plans to add more payment methods, but currently only offer Play Store in-app payments, which requires Play Services.
Ok so given how long it took them to allow an alternative to phone numbers, it will probably be at least 5 years before you can pay using a de-googled phone. I really don’t understand what’s so hard for them to accept crypto, they already do for donations. Smells like government involvement.
Whoa holy overreaction batman.
My comment wasn’t directed only at you, which is why I used the broader term “people”. I was just wondering if people had a legitimate reason to use archive.is over archive.org, considering I overwhelmingly see the former over the latter nowadays.