Promo, to be clear, is a self promotion post.
“I found a neat project” doesn’t apply, because you aren’t affiliated and wouldn’t know how it was developed, if AI was used and how, etc. You also wouldn’t be trying to get stars, clicks, donations, or payment for that software, so the promotion rules do not apply.
Its just a regular post.
Yes, because it is a bit different than a search engine. It may not be changing the files, but it is telling you the way to do it. It might give you an outdated method/pattern, it might ignore conventions, and most importantly, it doesn’t really understand the problem its solving. Its not finding the optimal answer, its finding the most common.
So the resulting answer may work, but not necessarily be right. In a disclosure (see the new thread) that would be referred to as “hint” for lllm use.
That doesn’t mean the answer you got was necessarily wrong either, just an answer based on an amalgam of the most common for all the code fed into the model, no matter when the code was written.
It would be put into an ai disclosure, so it qualifies for a tag. Make sense?
https://anarchist.nexus/c/[email protected]/p/757813/selfhosted-ai
Please be sure to let me know when the community agrees with you. Or start a new post, if you’d like.
Edit: For your edit, https://anarchist.nexus/c/[email protected]/p/746919/rule-2-clarifications-and-new-rule-proposal and https://anarchist.nexus/c/[email protected]/p/753349/rule-7-adjustment
None of this is specifically about you, FYI.
There have been a good number of posts, and there are some people very solidly anti AI anything, some who use it as a tool, and some who use it for everything. That combo meant we need rules about it - in addition to the rules about account age and f/loss exceptions and the like.
Edit: For the record, the 100% vibecoded app I tested was posted by someone else.
That would just be keepass, which is what I use.
Keepass has native support for ftp, http, https, and webdav, and with a plugin supports scp, sftp, and ftps through the native save/open from url. There are even plugins for proton drive, google drive, onedrive, s3, box, dropbox… etc.
What else do you need/what do you need a fork for?
regardless of the tags, this will mostly speed up the dogpiling.
Yep.
But single word comments getting posted repeatedly can be removed, so while I don’t think the up/downvotes will change, I think the comment section will.
And maybe those folks who rush to downvote will realize they can just filter out the posts instead. We’ll see how that works out though.
You are more than welcome to offer another option.
I’ll mention:
Please, feel free to provide an option.
I’ll point out that what you’re commenting on specifically applies to promo project posts, and nothing else.
I’d love an idea to trim it down… but with the wide varieties of ways AI can be used, its hard.
I’m a good example of the “problem” person in a way. I’ll test all kinds of things (including a completely, 100% vibe coded app posted here recently… in a sectioned off vlan of course), but what AI was used for influences where I look. Documentation? Ok, not the worst, but I’m going to check for human review/blatant llm goofs. You used it to figure out how to talk to a serial controlled endpoint? Ok, thats what needs to be checked first.
You made the whole ass thing with Claude? I’ll test it like I said, but I doubt it would ever end up anywhere near my own production use, its more as a curiosity. 99/100 that level of generated is basically the same as calling it unmaintained imo.
So there is definite value to knowing where/how/how much, and if the comments consist of things already stated and just add “slop”, thats going to get deleted, its already disclosed, the people who comment that should filter instead. Its a two way benefit this way as I see it.
That said - I’m always open to options here, but considering recent comments and reports since I’ve taken over moderating, something is definitely needed.
Edit: And just to mention - nothing is ever set in stone, if you’ve not seen my other comments about it. Should anything change, or it becomes unwieldy, or someone finds a workaround to abuse, whatever - its always open for discussion.
Disclosure itself is a need, and I can confidently say there are enough people who are “no ai ever”, “all ai all the time”, and “only the AI use I agree with” to make something needed.
About the only way to simplify would be to not define the disclosure types, just to disclose it, but then half the post will be discussing where and how if its not defined (along with a bunch of reports about not fully disclosing AI use).
If promo posts included that up front, I don’t think it would be an issue, but its rare that any post includes even “I used/didn’t use AI”, if that.
Don’t think I need the model tbh, I’m generally on enough to address the untagged. The annoying part would be making the same comment over and over again (thus the short bit of python)
That would be me, yes. And considering what I already get reports on, this makes for clear practice and would overall reduce the issues that are currently out there.
The only ones with extra effort will be promo posts, and this disclosure is regularly requested of them anyway.
You’d also need to define “low effort ai”.
I don’t see that working, sorry.
As a thought, if a repo is already using ai-declaration.md or a similar ai disclosure, I think posting a link to that declaration as the reply to the AIP comment should count as the declaration reply, since they are already providing that information.
T-Mobile bought the parent company of Mint 2 years ago, its wholly owned by T-Mobile now.
Now that would get me to leave immediately, and ive been with T-Mobile for at least 15 years, maybe 20 at this point.
So thats one of the questions that will need to go to a poll, but if I were to give my opinion it would be that any use would mean a tag, and the disclosure area is where it can be detailed.
Otherwise we’d end up with a bajillion differing tags, so a disclosure section makes more sense.
Not tagging for assisted would also mean setting arbitrary lines, and would be way too subjective imo.
I run my local models on a Mac mini m2, but I could also be using AMD (ROCm), Intel with OpenVINO, or just CPU. Simple edge applications I could even use something like an RK3588.
Being tied to NVidia is marketing from NVidia, not the reality of LLMs.
If there’s any “x% self-ptomotion” threshold, they fail it, because it’s 100% self-promotion.
Not with f/loss, just account age and they are above the threshold there.
I’m just going to shortcut this and say two things:
I can guarantee the overwhelming majority (if not all) of your issues have nothing to actually do with LLMs and everything to do with corporations. Power use, data center buildouts, market impact, whatever - none it is an an llm problem. LLMs are just another piece of software, thats all.
Your personal opinion on this, as well as mine, does not change the overall conversation here. So how about we just stick to the topic at hand?
To be clear only AIP would be in the title, you can mention the hint and the where in the disclosure comment