- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
corey931@lemmy.wtfto
PC Master Race@lemmy.world•Valve aren't putting any exclusives on the Steam Machine because they see "the whole PC catalog as our 'launch exclusive'"English
5·18 days agoI have a question maybe dumb to ask because I don’t consider myself a gamer as such but do gamers really want exclusive games? To me, it seems terrible to the end consumer because it means you get locked into their ecosystems bit by bit, or maybe even you bought a whole console, spending 500 bucks just to play one game that codt you another 70 bucks
corey931@lemmy.wtfto
Technology@lemmy.world•Spotify Deleted 75 Million AI-Generated Tracks – and It’s Not Done YetEnglish
2·18 days agoSorry for the long comment but I think it’s worth it.
In the music industry different roles exist that change over time like they do in all industries of course but currently, there are songwriters, session players, audio engineers, producers, and artists just to mention a few. The trend is that producers need to do songwriting, audio engineering, and the actual music production for an artist nowadays. Many people want those roles to merge further with AI producing the whole thing and monetize it. That doesn’t work and I’ll explain why based on talks with people in the industry.
If someone uses Suno, Udio, or the likes for their lyrics and/or give a chord progression along with the lyrics, they wrote and own that bit but there are tons of nuances in the composition as to which drum beat comes when, what the synth is playing (arpeggios, pedals, etc) but all that is typically what AI buddies have not even remotely thought about because “the AI will do it”.
If they shove this into Suno, Udio, or the likes, they did not play an instrument themselves, which takes many years for it to sound good, so they did not perform the song, they did not compose the song, they did not produce the song, they did not own the full vision of the song either because they simply didn’t do it. An LLM most likely trained on stolen music is gonna do all that for them, so they don’t need to “bother” with that anymore and “just create”. It takes years and decades to master just one of those roles in the industry. Can it be rewarding to do something you couldn’t do before with AI? Hell yeah. But did you actually do anything for it? Eh, no.
Exactly for that reason you don’t actually own the piece. In fact, by law you don’t. That’s why you cannot submit it for sync licensing. Agents won’t take it. They don’t want to get sued because AI music made like that cannot be owned. It’s ripped from a bunch of other artists who might potentially sue them.
corey931@lemmy.wtfto
Technology@lemmy.world•SpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a monthEnglish
4·19 days agoFanboys
corey931@lemmy.wtfto
Technology@lemmy.world•SpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a monthEnglish
4·19 days agoInsider trading 101 right here
corey931@lemmy.wtfto
Technology@lemmy.world•Meta is adding ridiculous ‘rate limits’ and a soft paywall to its smart glassesEnglish
4·1 month agopeople who vouched with their money for these asshole companies seriously had it coming. they are the lords of enshittification
The API rate limit is really annoying, not to mention not disclosed, at least when I migrated away from Proton Drive using rclone