

He was actually in a care home at the time he died. Had been for a while.


He was actually in a care home at the time he died. Had been for a while.


Saying you aren’t casting doubt when you are in fact casting doubt doesn’t negate it.
Ah yes, the black and white fallacy. A sneaky version of it, but it’s here nonetheless.
I think explaining the opposing viewpoint and then disagreeing with it is a useful rhetorical tool. It is far more likely to convince someone they are wrong if you are able to state their position clearly and accurately. Saying, “I can understand why someone might doubt this person because of this reason,” and then saying, “I don’t doubt them, here is a possible answer” is more useful than just shitting on people.


I think you’ll notice I deleted my comment once I saw that. And also I wasn’t casting doubt. I believe her. And I supplied a possible reason that, as it turns out, was her reason.


deleted by creator
And none of them are orange, you say?


Bite matching is absurdly inaccurate, unfortunately. TV loves it though.


One day an AI might be, it won’t be an LLM though.
I’m no expert, but I feel like that’s akin to saying a human may be intelligent, but it won’t be Broca’s area of the brain.
I would think a true AGI would involve a lot of different neural networks doing different things. And an LLM could end up being a useful component of allowing it to communicate. Though who knows how the model would need to change if its language prompts are inputs from other neural nets.
And I have to imagine at this point major AI models aren’t just LLMs, that’s just the part we interface with.
Again, I’m very far from an expert. What I do know is that the current MASSIVE push with the technology* we have now is causing more harm than it’s worth.
*edit: typo
From the article: