Thank you! I just learned a lot. I’ve made the edit; hopefully won’t take too long to make it to the cache.

No worries; thank you for trying to help!

I’ve done it by ID at least 10 times. :/ I almost always use ID now, since it works so well for my purposes.

It’s not a 500, but the rest of the issue seems to indicate some things just aren’t being found. I wonder if there’s a way to go straight to MusicBrainz as a backup.

I’m actually generally finding it working better for me since they let you search for releases/groups and not just artists. Combined with MusicBrainz Picard for the metadata and finding the release ID, it’s pretty good.

This is AIP.

I hadn’t heard of this yet, but that’s exciting!

Thank you!

I had looked through the docs and didn’t see anything to indicate that there are agents or equivalent. Can you point me to the right place?

I like Portainer Agent. And I got used to the Portainer UI. Are there any others that support distributed environments like Portainer + Agents?

Portainer-ce is staying on 2.*. Will look into arcane

If they weren’t using LLMs to code, I’d mostly agree with that. But projects that put effort into integrating LLMs likely use them as well (as is the case here).

How about one that doesn’t use LLMs to code?

Goddamnit. I hope someone forks 2.20.

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/

I really like having the disclosure comment pinned for a more nuanced explanation of what, if any, AI went into a project or post. I think just a tag can’t capture the levels of AI use.

I’m personally a never-genAI, but, unless we go No AI as a community, I don’t think it makes sense to group all projects that touch AI for documentation with all that use it for testing with all that completely let the AI generate all their code, etc. And I don’t think setting a threshold for which get tagged makes sense either. Basically, a tag is misleading no matter how it’s implemented.

A1s have a defect that can cause them to catch fire. Yours may be experiencing that? I’d be careful.