The EU didn’t make anyone do that, site that have no business recoding the information put those up as a dark pattern to try and force people into accepting the terms so they can claim informed consent to the tracking. It’s malicious compliance, they could just not collect that tracking data that isn’t required to provide the service.
I’ve met plenty of people who were smart in one very specific domain and dumb as bricks in pretty much all other areas. People around them would praise them from being smart but they just seemed ordinary or even below average outside their niche and I’d never refer to them as being smart myself.
Maybe you are being elitist by putting this guy you knew on a pedestal when outside that one skill he impressed you with he was actually a pretty dumb person.
Unlike Wikipedia, the references supplied by LLM output often point to material that doesn’t actually support the LLM output. This can be because the LLM misapplies it to the wrong context or because it’s incorrectly correlated and has nothing to do with what the LLM output making it unhelpful for determining the accuracy of the output.
Sure it is, if I look something up in an encyclopedia or training material written by a subject matter expert I have high trust in its content. If I ask an AI I have low trust in its content. The two are not equivalent.
Of the options I would say 2 but you forgot option 3, have a hardware router handle it and trunk the ports to the proxmox hosts.
If you are looking up something you don’t know about, how do you know the info provided us correct?
Maybe, but even experienced devs seem to want to fall into the trap of thinking their expertise will mean they can skim review AI code and spot it’s mistakes rather than taking the time to properly review and understand the code. Low effort is low 3ffort regardless of your expertise.
I think anything over the “assisted” threshold in the OP is low effort and should be dumped.
“artists” and “create” do a lot of heavy lifting there. If you are prompting a generative model to make something for you, then you aren’t an artist or writer or programmer and you didn’t create anything.
Better technology won’t make LLM techniques break out of their limitations, we are already throwing massive compute at it for marginal returns.
Brocas area on its own isn’t intelligent and strapping a bunch of Brocas areas together won’t get you there either.
Most of the frontier models as far as I’m aware are basically a bunch of differently trained LLMs strapped together and even then there have only been incremental improvements to their performance, no new functionality has really emerged from doing that.
LLM investment is IMO a dead end hype train and will require breakthroughs in other techniques of machine learning to put together something we would recognise as truly intelligent. I’ll concede the possibility that LLM like functionality may be a portion of that but equally it may not be.
One day an AI might be, it won’t be an LLM though.
Again, most people don’t find it that useful that they will drop that kind of money on it even up front. Telling me that you are an outlier than has gone all in on AI and can’t live without it doesn’t really change the point I was making does it? Most people will just skip using AI if they have to pay for it and don’t use it to “offload” most of their work to which frankly just makes you sound lazy.
Doesn’t matter if it’s useful if it’s too expensive to use for the majority of use cases it has. Voice assistants like the echo are useful and people like them. However they aren’t particularly profitable because people hate when they get monetised and won’t use them that way.
AI is likely the same, most of the stuff it’s being used for… even vibe coding where it’s been hyped to the moon and back, probably aren’t viable when the total cost of the compute needed for training and running are actually been charged for.
This is probably a fine and responsible way of using LLM, but sadly the loudest voices are those crowing about coding being a “solved” problem and bragging about being 10x more productive by doing very little and certainly not reviewing refactoring and understanding the generated code.
Only gotcha for this is LLM is being offered well below cost, will you still want yo use it at 5x or 10x the cost?
You are right, they were already doing that but the annoying popups aren’t because of the EU, the sites could just not set cookies to collect data they didn’t need to provide the service by default and not nag you constantly to let them have their way. It’s operation “wear them down” .