The vulnerability existed for 23 years, was recently discovered and patched and that patch introduced a new bug

That’s fair, I was adding a bit of my own judgment into that statement.

I believe that the circuit court will find that this is a typical search, requiring a warrant, but the Supreme Court didn’t explicitly say that.

This ruling confirms that there is no other legal path to obtain that data which isn’t a warrant.

Of course, you’re right that there are other ways to prove location, but the digital evidence (as in this case) would be suppressed and the jury would not hear it.

The case that launched this Supreme Court decision is pretty textbook poison fruit. The subsequent search warrant which obtained the gun and cash was obtained specifically because of the geofence warrant. The lower court still has to determine the legality of the original warrant, but if it was found to be unreasonable (likely, overly broad) then all of the evidence including the custodial confession would be tossed.

So, like every other aspect of life in the US then

Lol

I argue in multiple tabs and sometimes get them mixed up as well. 🫡

I’m talking about the location evidence that is the topic of the Supreme Court ruling linked in the OP of this thread where you’re crafting your bad faith arguments.

As you and I both know, a case built on illegally obtained evidence is also illegal.

They can present whatever arguments they’d like and a judge can read the above Supreme Court case, rule that their case is built on illegal evidence and dismiss it. If that judge does not the the judges in the court of appeals can overturn the lower court.

Yes, if the world were a John Grisham novel, some nefarious group could blackmail multiple judges across all levels of the appellate provesd, rig the system to ensure they’re all assigned the case (by blackmailing the clerk of clurt) in order to ensure that they would have a chance to show illegally obtained location evidence to the jury, all 12 of whom are also blackmailed (why not?) to prove a person’s phone was at a specific location.

Do you have any other fantasy scenarios that need co-signing?

Are you asking for help understating what I wrote? Or do you think that sarcastically attacking strawmen of your own creation is an argument?

Corrupt judges and bad decisions are why courts of appeal exist. These courts use multiple judges chosen at random specifically to prevent the kind of collusive behaviour that you’re implying.

The President doing illegal things has no bearing on the admissibility of evidence.

The judge decides what is allowed to be used at trial. If the prosecution ignore the judge and presents it anyway then the judge rules the case a mistrial. If the judge allows it then the court of appeal would overturn the ruling.

This doesn’t stop them from illegally obtaining the evidence, but it provides the ruling that prevents it from being used at trial.

They can illegally obtain the data all they’d like, this ruling means that the data obtained like that will be suppressed and not allowed to be shown to a jury.

Ignoring that would result in a mistrial and that decision would be upheld all the way up the chain via appeals.

If they didn’t get a warrant then this ruling means that every court must require that the evidence be suppressed.

No, they can’t obtain the data without a warrant.

That broadly covers every way that information could come to them.

It’s like how the police can’t search your apartment without a warrant even if the landlord voluntarily makes them a copy of the key.

I put it on a poke bowl, was delicious!

I had to look up the right ratios online… apparently you can also use sour cream 🤔

California/Volcano roll is my goto.

I tried eel first (wasn’t told what it was until I confirmed it was good😂)

I’m l getting sushi later, I’ll have to try that when I get home (assuming leftovers).

I’ve had ‘sushi’ where the meat was, cooked, chicken and the roll was tempura battered and fried.

It was good, as fried foods tend to be

Truly one of the people of all time