I had to read the headline several times to figure out:

A Why the hair salon was directing its trans clients to pet its groomers

B Why that direction was illegal

I liked my first interpretation better, tbh.

I forgot about the same principle I just explained xD

The nonviolent wing marches and makes demands and does public facing stuff. The people prepared to be violent provide security, community defense, and the implicit threat of force if peaceful demands are not met. They’re not opposed, they should work together.

We’d all be protesting, striking, and refusing to pay rent if we had our schools getting bombed because of our government.

would we? also, “protesting, striking, and refusing to pay rent” is not the appropriate response to someone trying to murder you.

God I was so embarrassed watching the king of fucking england cringe at our clap obsession in congress a few months ago…

I didn’t say confronting people with the, yes fucking braindead obvious conclusion of putting “notoriously friends with and protector of pedophiles whose name appears literally more than anyone else in the epstein documents, requiring literally thousands of manhours of redactions of specifically his name from the epstein documents,” and also “is a rapist” together would solve anything: there will always be people who will refuse to trust even their own instincts, let alone the testimony of multiple mutually corroborating victims, FBI documents with repeated, mutally corroborating anonymous tips about Trump individually and Trump in connection with Epstein (and I really could go on at some considerable length further here); I said it was necessary (about fucking time).

Sure. Let’s all just ignore the credible, repeated, unadjudicated claims of child rape for whatever catastrophe the obvious¹ child rapist is causing to distract from all his other crimes this week. why not. yeah great idea. who cares about an uncounted number of children who wont even speak up for themselves for some reason. all those politicians around the world connected to this are probably like, low level and unimportant anyway. no princes or princesses or kings or presidents or pms or senators or entire national alliances are implicated in this. youre so fucking smart and reasonable dude, it was such a wise and ethical idea to ignore all those child rapes good call bro

1. like, comically obvious:

edit: “Sure, he’s capable of operating concentration camps and bombing countries just to manipulate the stock market, but I draw the line at any suggestion he might have RAPED CHILDREN. Be reasonable.”

edit2: a thing can be necessary but insufficient in itself. the two are not incompatible.

edit3: he had to be talked out of pardoning ghislane for the love of all that is good in this world… how fucking obtuse can you be?

it’s about time for some people to rub two thoughts, “convicted rapist” and “pedophile protector” together in their minds for a few moments to reach the frankly braindead obvious conclusion.

honestly. Why are people shouting “pedophile protector” instead of the much more damaging and relevant “child rapist?”

that is being done, i have even participated. signs are insufficient. you do not complain fascism away, alas. the only thing left now is to force the necessary changes, and people are far too comfortable for that.

comfort

this again? you’re being obtuse.

Aw, thats a real shame… So anyway, I says to mabel, I says,