

I doubt he wants the actual infrastructure. He probably just wants their RF spectrum license.


I doubt he wants the actual infrastructure. He probably just wants their RF spectrum license.


“Now what?” Is apparently helping to turn the United States in to Nazi Germany for “teh lolz”
Are they supposed to? I didn’t infer any link between them. I just thought they were random slang words from that era, contrasting the different feel they have.
Mine just carried different colors of “cola”.
deleted by creator


So if Google said that companies can no longer use Android, you would be satisfied?


I still strongly disagree. “No, you can’t use this at all” is more abusive than “ok, we’ll let you use this if you agree to something else”. If you didn’t agree with the terms, you are no worse off than the other choice. Android is the “only choice” exactly because Apple won’t share.


How can one be considered abusive and the other not, if companies are free to choose not to use android, just like companies can’t use Apple’s OS? Both have the same result, the company not using the OS. Google’s position is more permissive than Apples, yet Apple’s isn’t considered abusive.


Right. Google gives away AOSP to any manufacturer. Apple doesn’t let ANYONE else use their OS. Yet Google is the one who gets in trouble for being “restrictive”.
I’m not upset that Google is getting called it for this, they are not innocent. I just want Apple to be held to the same standard.


And once again, Apple gets a pass for doing the same thing, only worse.
The Internet is my app store.


Shit-tons of profit, if you happen to own a company that specializes in rocket launches.


As someone with prosopagnosia (face blindness) these types of glasses would be an incredible assistive technology for myself and others like me, but even I’m aware of the significant privacy concerns and don’t feel the benefit outweighs the societal risks.


Same. I’ve happily used it for over 2 decades and decided that they actually deserve some money for that. I’ve since switched to Linux, but don’t regret paying for WinRAR at all.


Sure, but even if it could, they probably shouldn’t just keep running in to stuff and routing through areas where there are known collisions. If those are problems they can’t seem to solve, then maybe it’s a product that shouldn’t exist.


I like to deal with facts and measured responses instead of being instantly reactionary 🤷


That might be true, but it sounds like like a completely different feature than what the article is discussing. This is talking about a new feature that requires the user to select a specific section of the page in order to make it visible to the I’m LLM.
I am a little confused though, as to why this new feature would be needed if it could already read the entire screen.


The headline seems a little inflammatory. It requires the user to explicitly select a region to share.
Google is making Gemini a lot more aware of what’s happening inside Chrome. The company has started rolling out a new “Select from screen” feature that lets users highlight specific text or images from a webpage and send them directly to Gemini, making conversations with the AI assistant far more contextual.


I had a booth at a craft show on a college campus a few months back. The little bastards kept trying to route through the show and were constantly bumping in to tables. They even knocked over a couple of tables at a few vendor stalls, damaging some of the items.
Unfortunately they DO notice when you actually take sick days. Avoiding taking sick days isn’t so much about thinking you’ll get rewarded as it is about trying not to get punished.