Sorry, I stopped reading where you revealed yourself to have absolutely no understanding of history or how anything at all works. Right about here:
violent revolution, which might result in some short-term changes but doesn’t change the constitution
A revolution by its very nature implies that the old constitution is done away with. The rest of your tripe is equally suitable for fertilizing crops.
Incremental change never lasts. It’ll be clawed back by the bourgeoisie as soon as the forces that pressured them into making the concessions are removed. Look at the rapid deterioration of labor rights and working conditions that came about within a few years after the USSR fell and western capitalists no longer needed to make sure their workers didn’t look too fondly at Communism.
For real and lasting change, the exploiter class must be ruthlessly suppressed, and the existing power structures destroyed, and a genuine democracy (which the US has never been) instituted in their place.
Sorry, I stopped reading where you revealed yourself to have absolutely no understanding of history or how anything at all works. Right about here:
A revolution by its very nature implies that the old constitution is done away with. The rest of your tripe is equally suitable for fertilizing crops.
Incremental change never lasts. It’ll be clawed back by the bourgeoisie as soon as the forces that pressured them into making the concessions are removed. Look at the rapid deterioration of labor rights and working conditions that came about within a few years after the USSR fell and western capitalists no longer needed to make sure their workers didn’t look too fondly at Communism.
For real and lasting change, the exploiter class must be ruthlessly suppressed, and the existing power structures destroyed, and a genuine democracy (which the US has never been) instituted in their place.
Well good luck with that. You’ll kill a lot of innocent people in the process, but who cares right?