Iraq was clearly brought up by that commenter as a metaphor for the current haranguing in the west about China. Same shit, different enemy. The manufacture of consent continues with little resistance.
I mean I don’t know what you’re trying to say here cuz yeah that’s objectively correct. Liberals valued the concept of private property so incredibly highly that slavery was extended and preserved in most of the world when it didn’t need to be. That is undeniably their legacy.
Considering how many liberals support things like returning slavery to Tibet, or enslaving Libya, or doing similar things to Syria, Palestine, Korea, Russia, Afghanistan, etc. they might as well be saying that.
Hell, you do support NATO attacking and subjugating the rest of the world, so why pretend as if I don’t have any examples?
Speaking of examples, you haven’t pointed out any socialists who supported the Confederacy at the time, nor any socialists who do now.
Supporting reactionary uprisings is actually the liberal thing.
Case in point - all the clamouring for slaver rulers in Tibet.
The Tibet thing is just CCP propaganda
Don’t know what “CCP” is, but it’s pretty silly how brazenly you ignore reality just because your masters told you that “Iraq has WMDs” again.
CCP is the chinese communist party. Who brought up Iraq?!?!
Iraq was clearly brought up by that commenter as a metaphor for the current haranguing in the west about China. Same shit, different enemy. The manufacture of consent continues with little resistance.
Ah, so you misspelled “CPC” - “the Communist Party of China”.
I mean, you keep uncritically believing what the people who sold you on Nayirah’s testimony and Iraq’s WMDs say about their enemies.
Yep, that’s the quote from every liberal: “Yay slavery”
-The average dipshit redcap uncle, and/or Tomorrow_Farewell
I mean I don’t know what you’re trying to say here cuz yeah that’s objectively correct. Liberals valued the concept of private property so incredibly highly that slavery was extended and preserved in most of the world when it didn’t need to be. That is undeniably their legacy.
Considering how many liberals support things like returning slavery to Tibet, or enslaving Libya, or doing similar things to Syria, Palestine, Korea, Russia, Afghanistan, etc. they might as well be saying that.
Hell, you do support NATO attacking and subjugating the rest of the world, so why pretend as if I don’t have any examples?
Speaking of examples, you haven’t pointed out any socialists who supported the Confederacy at the time, nor any socialists who do now.