Your local government spent thousands of dollars on each one, so return the favor by protecting their investment!

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Do you really not understand that this is meant to be an easy tool to disable them, so that someone could do anything (or nothing) else to them safely?

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      And it’s technically not damaging the camera. So hard to get prosecuted for vandalism.

    • Alavi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s silly.

      You can just put a normal sock/cloth on them for that.

      And the flock guys will just simply remove it and you have spent money on making that fancy cover. You can straight up smash it with the same shovel/stick that it shows in the video instead of dressing it up.