• thejml@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you did this, you’d have like 20 CD’s by the end of the year (way more id you can find used ones) that you completely own and no one can pull the license for later.

    Ripping them is easy and allows you to play them anywhere, even without internet.

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I can stream more than 20cds worth from a catalog far more expansive than anything I could dream to store. It’s simply worth the money for my usage. Moreover, I don’t want to store anything locally, physically or otherwise. I’m ok with the risk of them pulling licensing, because after over a decade and a half of usage it’s been an issue thats come up fewer than 5 times, and each time there was an alternative track/release available (i.e. part of a newer album or rerecorded).

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t disagree with you. But I have a lot of CDs already :) The rationale for me is that it’s all available. I watched a Billy Joel documentary recently (I know 🙄) but it made do a listen through his discography. I’m glad I didn’t buy those. It turns out I already knew the songs I liked and discovered 0 enjoyable deep cuts. But even at $15 a disc that would have been a $200 play through. And yes I’m aware of the high seas and the library.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      While true, I don’t have to do any work at all right now to listen to as much music as I want and new music is available immediately. I also don’t have to setup something to be able to stream music remotely so that I don’t have to store all of it on my space limited device.