I did, and I found quite a few of the people you just said didn’t exist.
I found even more arguments that relied on almost as much faulty logic as they did incorrect facts. Strawman arguments about what I believe as far as the eye can see, with the occasional easily googleable falsehood about how AI or Nightshade works or doesn’t thrown in for good measure.
Oh, and an absolute shitton of people just believing that stealing art is fine actually, or that if people like redrawing AI art, they must be okay with it because they “copied” the AI’s idea. I can’t decide which is worse, that they’re not arguing in good faith, or that their sense of what art theft is has been so warped that they actually unironically believe it.
Funny how you went from claiming an argument was a strawman to defending it as soon as you were shown other people believed it though. That’s super interesting.
I did, and I found quite a few of the people you just said didn’t exist.
I found even more arguments that relied on almost as much faulty logic as they did incorrect facts. Strawman arguments about what I believe as far as the eye can see, with the occasional easily googleable falsehood about how AI or Nightshade works or doesn’t thrown in for good measure.
Oh, and an absolute shitton of people just believing that stealing art is fine actually, or that if people like redrawing AI art, they must be okay with it because they “copied” the AI’s idea. I can’t decide which is worse, that they’re not arguing in good faith, or that their sense of what art theft is has been so warped that they actually unironically believe it.
Funny how you went from claiming an argument was a strawman to defending it as soon as you were shown other people believed it though. That’s super interesting.