• Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s kinda sad. I felt the maintainers feeling of being overwhelmed and underappreciated, but that whole discussion in the issue and the later statement to just hide AI use was such a phenomenal PR debacle he’ll probably never get rid of.

    Lutris was pretty good…

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lutris was pretty good…

      Undoubtedly, the lutris scripts really made it a great community driven project.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just for gaming purposes, having a unified front end that:

        • lets you start an application with the arguments it needs, whether to use a specific Wine folder, or start an emulator with the right arguments

        • lets you tag up each application with some custom arguments - genre, date, and so on - and lets you filter and sort by them

        • lets you configure each app with their own box art or whatever as an icon

        • keeps some gaming-related metadata; hours played, whether you’ve finished it, …

        Essentially, Windows 3.1 Program Manager for the 21st century. Lutris did that quite well. Heroic doesn’t let you add custom stuff, it just integrates with store fronts. RetroArch has the old-school Linux problem of “all the functionality you need, plus all the functionality anyone might ever need, plus all the functionality that no-one needs, all arranged seemingly at random in dozens of menus”.

        Lutris scripts were great - just having the required winetricks commands to get something obscure working was awesome, but packaged up in a useful way along with art and metadata was handy. The front-end being “only what you need” was good as well. Shame it’s gone off the rails a bit…

        • DigDoug@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          The ability to apply community patches easily was super handy as well. It made installing games like Dungeon Keeper and Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines extremely simple.

          It’s now been months since I’ve successfully got Lutris to even install a game. It practically turned to slop overnight.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          RetroArch has the old-school Linux problem of “all the functionality you need, plus all the functionality anyone might ever need, plus all the functionality that no-one needs, all arranged seemingly at random in dozens of menus”

          This definitely does happen sometimes, especially these days, but this is explicitly opposite to old-school Linux design principles. A program should do one thing, it should do it well, and it should be able to be plugged in to other processes in order to accomplish whatever this single-purpose program accomplishes. If you want it to do something else, go get/write a different package to do something different. This is actually explicitly stated in the “Unix Philosophy” papers by Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, et al.

          • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The concept suffers a little bit with graphical applications. They don’t exactly have equivalents to stdin, stdout and stderr which you could pipe or read/write willy-nilly.

            RetroArch isn’t far off from the philosophy I think, those emulation cores are pretty much independent projects plugged into a frontend. Unfortunately that default frontend is pretty clunky and doesn’t come with sane defaults for known ROMs. Or even sane menu navigation tbh, main menu and game menu looked way too similar last time I used it…

        • Ghoelian@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Heroic lets you add plenty of custom stuff. The only thing I’m missing from lutris is tagging/grouping of games, everything else I ever used in lutris is available in heroic.

          • addie@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It lets you “add game”, but then gives you the choice of Linux / Windows with a Wine version / browser, and you have to put in the path.

            So for example, in Lutris I could have “every Zelda game” or “every Castlevania game” as a filter. Castlevania needs MSX, NES, Gameboy, SNES, N64, DS, PSX, PS2, and Wii emulation; and one of (Steam, or PS3 or X360 emulation) to be reasonably complete.

            I suppose I could create a Linux shell script that daisy-chains into the correct emulator, but that would be quite clunky compared to Lutris, which is still pretty clunky. And I wouldn’t be able to filter to that, nor sort them by release date.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      but that whole discussion in the issue and the later statement to just hide AI use

      Well fuck

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Another commenter just made me aware that the maintainer moved back on his hiding of Claude (because it “apparently is a big deal”… yeah, what tipped you off Sherlock?), which is good. But it’s still being used, so… still bad.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      AFAIK the dev reversed his stance on ai after the blowback. Do you have newer information that contradicts that? Because otherwise you are both just hating on lutris for no reason.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        AFAIK the dev had committed a bunch of AI nonsense intentionally not labeling it at such or keeping track of what was slop in any way. Do you have newer information that contradicts that? Because otherwise you don’t know what you’re talking about for no reason.