• Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This NOTICE in both repos is weird asf:

    Docker Copyright 2012-2017 Docker, Inc.

    This product includes software developed at Docker, Inc. (https://www.docker.com/).

    This product contains software (https://github.com/creack/pty) developed by Keith Rarick, licensed under the MIT License.

    The following is courtesy of our legal counsel:

    Use and transfer of Docker may be subject to certain restrictions by the United States and other governments. It is your responsibility to ensure that your use and/or transfer does not violate applicable laws.

    For more information, please see https://www.bis.doc.gov/

    See also https://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html and/or seek legal counsel.

    Also, they do limit some kind of uses if you don’t pay.

    • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Use and transfer of Docker may be subject to certain restrictions by the United States and other governments. It is your responsibility to ensure that your use and/or transfer does not violate applicable laws.

      That’s true of all software. It may be subject to restrictions by governments. But in this case, it seems to refer to the fact that the US restricted export of cryptographic software, and seemingly continues to restrict. See also Bernstein v. United States.

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Also, they do limit some kind of uses if you don’t pay.

      You mean Docker Desktop?

      Also iirc all software developed in the USA is subject to those restrictions.

      • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        …iirc all software developed in the USA is subject to those restrictions.

        Oh, well, I didn’t knew about that, yeah.

        You mean Docker Desktop?

        And, in part yes, but these restrictions also apply to docker-cli and moby, although to a lesser extent

        • Lena@gregtech.eu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          And, in part yes, but these restrictions also apply to docker-cli and moby, although to a lesser extent

          What restrictions? The ones on all US software or something else?

            • Lena@gregtech.eu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              The Apache License 2.0 does allow commercial use, and basically any other use. Can you say specifically where those restrictions are stated?