It’s not a wall of text, you lazy bum. I have already explained my position to you. Once again, you have refused to read it. Go back, read what I wrote, and all of your questions will be answered. If I’m hiding behind a wall of text, then you’re hiding behind your own laziness.
And it’s less than five minutes of reading. I’m not putting in the effort to explain things to you again if you’re just going to refuse to read it because it’s “too long.”
And stop bringing up non sequiturs about whether I support surveillance, don’t support surveillance, support ICE, or don’t support ICE. That is completely irrelevant to both your original response and my very long response to you.
Secondly, aside from the gibberish I responded with above, the first thing you refused to read was my own words. They weren’t ChatGPT-generated.
And stop bringing up non sequiturs about whether I support surveillance, don’t support surveillance, support ICE, or don’t support ICE. That is completely irrelevant to both your original response and my very long response to you.
It’s entirely relevant. If you support these things it makes sense why you would support politicians who do. If you don’t support these things then you need to explain why you support politicians who do. We can’t have a conversation about why you and I see politicians differently without examining each other’s reasons for doing so. I made an assumption earlier that you don’t support ICE or warrantless surveillance like Flock. But here you are outright refusing to say so. My assumptions were incorrect.
You support these politicians because you support fascism in the form of ICE and warrantless surveillance. You’re a fascist supporter.
Buddy in the age of chatGPT spitting out walls of text isn’t the flex you think it is.
Proper beliefs depend on strong foundations. When I ask to see your foundations you hide behind walls of text. Your foundations are weak and rotting.
I’ll ask you again.
Did you support ICE in 2009? Did you support warrantless surveillance in 2009?
It’s not a wall of text, you lazy bum. I have already explained my position to you. Once again, you have refused to read it. Go back, read what I wrote, and all of your questions will be answered. If I’m hiding behind a wall of text, then you’re hiding behind your own laziness.
And it’s less than five minutes of reading. I’m not putting in the effort to explain things to you again if you’re just going to refuse to read it because it’s “too long.”
And stop bringing up non sequiturs about whether I support surveillance, don’t support surveillance, support ICE, or don’t support ICE. That is completely irrelevant to both your original response and my very long response to you.
Secondly, aside from the gibberish I responded with above, the first thing you refused to read was my own words. They weren’t ChatGPT-generated.
It’s entirely relevant. If you support these things it makes sense why you would support politicians who do. If you don’t support these things then you need to explain why you support politicians who do. We can’t have a conversation about why you and I see politicians differently without examining each other’s reasons for doing so. I made an assumption earlier that you don’t support ICE or warrantless surveillance like Flock. But here you are outright refusing to say so. My assumptions were incorrect.
You support these politicians because you support fascism in the form of ICE and warrantless surveillance. You’re a fascist supporter.
You can’t prove that.