sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoZuckerberg lied about concern for child safety, Meta whistleblower testifies at landmark trialwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1321arrow-down1external-linkZuckerberg lied about concern for child safety, Meta whistleblower testifies at landmark trialwww.theguardian.comsanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square23linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 days agoIf only taxation in the past worked (it did)! Is there any way we can get out of this terrible predicament (it’s taxing the wealthy, btw).
minus-squarestopdropandprole@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·3 days agotax wealth not work
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days ago100% cool with taxing wealth.
minus-squareepicstove@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoThe tragedy of a missing coma. They meant “Tax wealth, not work” as in we should tax excessive wealth as opposed to taxing the labour of everyday people.
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoThat is how I read it.
minus-squareTehhund@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoI think everyone in this thread agrees with each other.
If only taxation in the past worked (it did)!
Is there any way we can get out of this terrible predicament (it’s taxing the wealthy, btw).
tax wealth not work
100% cool with taxing wealth.
The tragedy of a missing coma.
They meant “Tax wealth, not work” as in we should tax excessive wealth as opposed to taxing the labour of everyday people.
That is how I read it.
I think everyone in this thread agrees with each other.