Dr. Anthony Fauci on Friday declined a request to appear voluntarily before a second Senate panel after majority Republicans on the Homeland Security Committee voted along partisan lines last week to hold the longtime infectious disease expert in contempt.

In a pointed letter to Sen. Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, a lawyer for the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases said any effort to compel him to appear before a Senate subcommittee, after a contentious July 29 hearing, would be to "impermissibly harass or degrade Dr. Fauci for political purposes.”

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    We do not know this.

    Please, go ahead and make it more abundantly clear that you don’t know how the US justice system works. If people could be indicted simply because there’s no proof of their innocence, then no one would be safe from prosecution.

    It depends how linked he is to his aide

    Say you work retail and your coworker gets busted for murder. Are you somehow implicated because you work with the person?

    I have made no claim either way.

    Neither has Fauci. That’s what pleading the fifth is.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Read the initial statement.

      “It’s not that he’s done anything incriminating”.

      It is not “we can prove in court he did something indicatable”. This is not a case of innocent until proven guilty.

      Are you somehow implicated because you work with the person?

      If you are a boss and your subordinate does something wrong that is work related, you are either implicated or negligent. Neither are good.

      Neither has Fauci [made a claim].

      I’m not correcting Fauci. I’m correcting the inital statement above.