I think your questions are flawed because you’re working under the assumption that consistency and reason are relevant for these people to form an opinion.
It doesn’t matter their beliefs are contradictory and they don’t need to spin anything, they just think whatever Fox news / Trump tells them to think.
This is probably a flawed analogy, but to me it’s a little like watching a movie like Supergirl and arguing whether the giant explosion was an authentic detonation or CGI. I know what I saw wasn’t an actual spaceship vaporizing, but I am fascinated by the details.
I think your questions are flawed because you’re working under the assumption that consistency and reason are relevant for these people to form an opinion.
It doesn’t matter their beliefs are contradictory and they don’t need to spin anything, they just think whatever Fox news / Trump tells them to think.
This is probably a flawed analogy, but to me it’s a little like watching a movie like Supergirl and arguing whether the giant explosion was an authentic detonation or CGI. I know what I saw wasn’t an actual spaceship vaporizing, but I am fascinated by the details.