Systemd: no particular thoughts. It’s a PID1 and process manager? 😅 If I’d had to say something, then perhaps it “hampers” my Linux learning, since instead of having to write config files and scripts and learning to work with symlinks (for instance between config and whatnot templates in /usr/share/ and things you actually apply in /etc/), it has a lot of automation built in with all its -ctl commands.
That’s the truth. The problem with systemd is that it’s too good.
Wayland is neat and may reach feature parity with X11 just in time for it to be replaced by the next thing!
Not really. It took a while but it’s been solid for a long time. Much as I resent their “our way or the highway” policy, but Ubuntu pulling support for X11 is probably for the best. Solves the adoption problem.
Started with Arch, landed on Artix ☺️
What are your thoughts on systemD and wayland?
Systemd: no particular thoughts. It’s a PID1 and process manager? 😅 If I’d had to say something, then perhaps it “hampers” my Linux learning, since instead of having to write config files and scripts and learning to work with symlinks (for instance between config and whatnot templates in
/usr/share/and things you actually apply in/etc/), it has a lot of automation built in with all its-ctlcommands.Wayland: never used. It looks fancy? 😅
Sorry for boring answers. 🫣
That’s the truth. The problem with systemd is that it’s too good.
Wayland is neat and may reach feature parity with X11 just in time for it to be replaced by the next thing!
Not really. It took a while but it’s been solid for a long time. Much as I resent their “our way or the highway” policy, but Ubuntu pulling support for X11 is probably for the best. Solves the adoption problem.