Please tell me i’m not the only one who still finds this ridiculous and believes that only a court of law can determine guilt?

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I think he should take her to court there are things that can prove his innocence. Warrants to get the cell phone pings of his location, the instagram data that was supposedly deleted can still be retrieved. The emails to the Therapist. He should also have other women in his life that he’s dated speak on his character.

    If Johnny Depp can win against Amber Heard I think he still has a chance.

    • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      The women he’s dated have spoken on his character, it was pretty bad.

      I dunno, this feels like how Republicans defend their own regardless of what comes out. I get you can like a guy’s stances but at some point, if we want to be the party of good, we have to act like it.

        • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Sure, that’s up to the victim etc.

          And as far as I’m aware, being a felon doesn’t make someone ineligible for running for Senate.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            If he was convicted, and he didn’t have the honor to step down, the Senate would vote to kick him out at that point. The Senate has routinely voted to kick people out convicted of serious felonies. And he would be replaced with another Democrat anyway. Plus the establishment dems would be happy to see him go.

            If he’s convicted, and if he doesn’t step down, he would be kicked out of the Senate by a vote of 99-1.

            • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              So, if his victim doesn’t feel comfortable undergoing the emotional toil of a legal battle about rape, that means he’s good people?

              Have you also lobbied and argued for folks who stepped down etc after the Epstein files as almost none of that has gone to court yet?

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                So, if his victim doesn’t feel comfortable undergoing the emotional toil of a legal battle about rape, that means he’s good people?

                If you really internalize the foundational values of our democracy, yes. You do understand that we’re not supposed to punish people without trial, right? If a victim doesn’t want to come forward, I can understand why. But protecting victims is no excuse to dismantle the very foundations of justice.

                Have you also lobbied and argued for folks who stepped down etc after the Epstein files as almost none of that has gone to court yet?

                To my knowledge, none of those accusations were made in an extremely opportune manner that demanded action be immediately taken without proper time to investigate them. And the people who were asked to step down are those who we have clear evidence of making damning emails with Epstein. That’s the key thing - we have the actual damning emails. We have very little contemporary evidence here.

                • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  You do understand that we’re not supposed to punish people without trial, right?

                  There’s a different between legal punishment and consequences. Typically on the Left, we have this fight with the Right about free speech; yes, the government won’t stop you from saying horrific things but those horrific statements still have consequences. Kanye for example, has committed (as far as I know) no crimes but I would be similarly uncomfortable were he running for Senate.

                  (I also think it’s pretty funny that in the next paragraph, you’re totally fine with people stepping down without a trial, even though you also claim that punishing people without a trial is a foundational value of American democracy.)

                  I think at the end of the day, it comes down to what you’re willing to tolerate. Personally, I have many women and girls in my life whom I love and value so, I don’t feel at all comfortable with an accused rapist running for Senate. I’ve known enough victims to have some sense of how horrific those situations are, why not everyone feels comfortable going to trial and why predators should be avoided. I didn’t feel good about Platner after the piece came out a month ago detailing a bunch of disturbing behavior to women but hey, everyone has different values.

                  To each their own.

      • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Nah Republicans are a different breed because they’ll keep supporting even after the court of law has been applied to establish guilt. I’m asking for people to at least let him get to court. Also what sources do you have to show people speaking on his character?

        • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Mr. Platner could be rough with her, Ms. Fifield said, particularly when they were drinking, leaving her shaken and sometimes afraid. In the interviews, Ms. Fifield grappled with how to process her experiences. She was quick to note that he “never hit me, he never punched me.”

          But she said he regularly grabbed her by the shoulders — sometimes hard enough to leave marks — and, on one occasion, yanked her out of a cab by her wrist after an argument when she wanted to stay in the car.

          During one argument, she recalled, he twisted her arm behind her back, shoved her into a bedroom and held the door closed from the other side so she couldn’t get out, telling her to remain there until she was “calm.” Eventually, Ms. Fifield said, she fell asleep and left the next morning.

          https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/us/politics/platner-maine-senate-girlfriends-relationships.html

          • velma@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            There are people seriously pushing here that because this woman is conservative she must be lying.

            I believe her.

            • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              That’s such a weird line, like she planned this out a decade before Platner got into politics?

              It’s just so depressing. I get that folks can love his positions but goddamn, I also thought we had standards.

              • velma@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                There’s some real conspiracy theory shit brewing here. Talk about the text messages being made up by Israel and whatnot. It’s a little much considering the most believable part of this story is that a man got drunk and forced himself on the woman he was seeing at the time.

                • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  Ugh.

                  I guess, glass half full, it’s nice to see the Right doesn’t have a monopoly on “well, he’s our guy so everything else is a rigged conspiracy.”

                  Depressing AF.