The site explained that it is most dangerous for folks who have had gender-affirming surgery to stop hormones. For this group, stopping medication can lead to heart complications, metabolic dysfunction, severe bone density loss, cognitive decline, and mood instability.
“For post-operative trans people who have undergone gender-affirming surgery and no longer have their original gonads, withdrawing hormones is not an option, it’s a medical crisis,” GenderGP wrote, adding that banning these hormones “isn’t a political statement, it’s medical malpractice.”
The sponsor of the bill to ban gender-affirming care, state Rep. Dirk Deaton ®, said in March that he decided to add the anti-trans provision to the bill because there have been a lot of new appointments to the court and “a lot of change… in the national conversation around this issue.”
Missouri is a shithole state. Though, technically speaking, this might arise to the level of cruel and unusual for the already-transitioned inmates for the same reason that denying medical care to regular people is cruel and unusual. Wonder how long until we just declare transgender people as illegal to force them to die. Its probably what all the bathroom bills and ID stuff is all about.
Can someone please explain to me what happens to the body in this case?
“The site explained that it is most dangerous for folks who have had gender-affirming surgery to stop hormones. For this group, stopping medication can lead to heart complications, metabolic dysfunction, severe bone density loss, cognitive decline, and mood instability.”
—The previous paragraph.
All thanks to laws being made by people with zero knowledge of medical science
It’s not about science or saving money or protecting inmates or women.
It never ever was.
It’s about hurting people they don’t like. To them, the government is either a red carpet or a cudgel.
B-but imaginary sky daddy! Protect the kids!
This is why we need lobbyists. Donate to HRC and similar nonprofits
From what I understand, biological systems regulated by sex hormones require one or the other to work at all. For example, you get one pattern of post-puberty bone growth with estrogen, a different pattern with testosterone, and no bone growth at all if you have neither. These systems also have some counterbalancing factor, like your bones constantly being slowly dissolved to keep calcium in your bloodstream, so if you have no gonads and no supplementary hormones, you essentially speedrun osteoporosis over the course of a few years.
I’m not too clear on other effects, but a lot of things are downstream of “your bones slowly melt,” and lots of other parts of your body rely on sex hormones to regulate them and will have long-term issues without them.
So did this happen to eunuchs in olden times too?
Basically. But, the life span used to be shorter. Also, eunuchs didn’t subject themselves to much that could cause them harm: they were mostly present as servants to rich/royal harems/wives of polygamy, or they were apart of the priesthood. But, their life expectancy was low, even for the time.
I vaguely remember that some hormones are relevant for bone integrity. I imagine losing that would be all around awful.