• HailSeitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    1-2? Like choosing to destroy the wealth of millions of homeowners while bailing out the banks, and deporting millions of hardworking people?

      • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah man, using the best tech at the time to limit collateral damage to a minimum is totally a net negative. Lets just bomb places like we used to, that’s a much better option right?

        • NewDark@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have a better solution. Don’t do both of those things. If you think it’s justified for some greater good, you’re falling for the propaganda.

          • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah sure knowing the dudes killing US soldiers, then eliminating them in the best way possible at the time is totally a bad thing.

            • NewDark@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why are they killing US soldiers? Where are these soldiers and why?

              They’re likely at one of ~800 military bases the empire has around the world that we use as an implicit (and sometime explicit) threat. We do violence so you can have bananas picked by slaves and install governments that will let us fleece the countries.

              Those soldiers aren’t defending us, they almost never die on US soil. They are there in an offensive capacity.