It doesn’t require much science. Victim testifies she bit the attacker and it drew blood. Attacker has scar of approximately the same age. That’s not going to secure a conviction on its own, but it adds to the prosecution’s evidence.
If it didn’t draw blood, it’d be harder to find a lasting mark.
It’s all bullshit, and has been proven to be bullshit. You are like one of those people still thinking dinosaurs were reptiles while we have known they were birds.
It doesn’t require much science. Victim testifies she bit the attacker and it drew blood. Attacker has scar of approximately the same age. That’s not going to secure a conviction on its own, but it adds to the prosecution’s evidence.
If it didn’t draw blood, it’d be harder to find a lasting mark.
It’s all bullshit, and has been proven to be bullshit. You are like one of those people still thinking dinosaurs were reptiles while we have known they were birds.