• ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    When they bought out one of the former big three (Chrysler) they kinda got included as a de facto member.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Does that mean Fiat, Maserati, and Alfa Romeo are also US brands now too? They could have included Tesla instead of Stellantis since Tesla actually is a US company (along with Ford and GM as the only remaining US brands). The article seems pretty nonsensical because of this.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Tesla didn’t get its start in Detroit. It said the “Detroit Three”, which was Ford, GM and Chrysler. Chrysler is owned by Stellantis now. So it made since to mention the parent company.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I get that, but the article is about US manufacturers and their sales numbers not sales of companies that once had a footprint in Detroit historically.

          I’m sure these companies want to pretend like they’re still ‘American owned’ but they aren’t and we shouldn’t entertain their fantasies. I mean if the why not include Toyota in that definition considering they’re built with the most US labor and US parts, even more so than companies like Ford and GM on average, since the parent company location doesn’t matter?