I just saw a DistroTube video with this question. Quite a thought provoking question [for this seasoned distroholic at least].

“What’s the hardest Linux distro you’ve tried?” can be interpreted many ways, and I wonder what kinds of answers we’ll get.

Especially these days, with much change underfoot and newer users having a different distrosphere to explore…

What’s the hardest Linux distro you’ve tried?

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    No, your distribution is the distribution. Your distribution doesn’t make Linux from Scratch into one. Let’s say I think your distribution is the best one for me. That does not mean another distribution created with the help of the documentation found at Linux from Scratch the best one too. Those are two different distributions. Linux from Scratch remains the documentation how to create one.

    It’s like finding a video tutorial how to program your own program a little game. The video tutorial doesn’t become a game, it remains documentation how you write your own game. That’s comparable situation with Linux from Scratch (in relation to our discussion).

    • Digit@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You just asserted elsewhere in this thread, that it’s not debatable. … Seemed like you were already putting forth debate arguments a day ago here.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I am not debating with you if LFS is a distribution or not, I teach you that its not.

            • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I don’t think you understand how definitions work.

              It might be false according to your definition, but not anyone else’s.

              It looks like you’re prepared to die on this hill though, so you do you.

              • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Just because you define something doesn’t make it correct. I think you don’t know what a Linux distribution is. There is no definition in where LFS is a Linux distribution.

                  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    This isn’t a question of definition. LFS cannot be installed as an operating system that distributes the Linux Kernel. It is a PDF or HTML document describing how you build a distribution. It’s like giving me a book in the hand that describes every detail how to build a car, by melting metal and building the motor. And then calling the book is a car. That has nothing to do with definition, if you don’t even know what a car is (here a distribution of Linux Kernel in an operating system).

                    Don’t talk about most people if you don’t know yourself what you are talking about.