• SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In concept nothing. But do you also recognize a legitimate business model of selling multiple products at different price points, spaced out more than the different cost of production?

      And speaking hypothetically with some stupid numbers is it your argument that they should be able to purchase the $20 product, add $10 of parts, and either use it or sell it as the $200 product?

      • Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In concept nothing. But do you also recognize a legitimate business model of selling multiple products at different price points, spaced out more than the different cost of production?

        Yes of course, but if the spacing is too much then stuff like this starts to happen.

        is it your argument that they should be able to purchase the $20 product, add $10 of parts, and either use it or sell it as the $200 product?

        Yes, once I buy something it’s mine to do with as I want. Obviously warranty may be void in some cases, but otherwise I own it.

        If the market exists that is willing to buy it as a $200 product then Raspberry Pi should sell them for that price, their costs would be much lower than someone who buys a Pi at retail, buys new RAM chips, spends the time to desolder and solder on the new RAM chips, market their ‘product’, and deal with shipping it. If the knockoff is $200 and the same-spec legitimate Pi with warranty is $200, the knockoff won’t be around for long.

      • Eximius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The fact that it is economically viable to resolder different chips, is already showing it’s a illegitimate business model, imo…

        Not a product, but a money grab