I’m not an AI techie and I’m not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I’m having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I’ve heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can’t really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    If the techies believe it and they are the “experts” what makes them crazy? Wouldn’t their opinion be the most informed?

    Listening to them speak about it, no. They’re morons. They clearly didn’t make the tech. Workers made AI. Just like they make everything. These freaks make nothing. They can’t give single coherent explanation of how LLMs work, how they could “kill” us, nor do they seem to know how or what “guardrails” need to be put in place.

    But if they really are a cult then we all know what the next step is. They need to STFU and get off of our planet.

    • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That’s what I mean though, the subject of this article was a 27 year old worker. Not some high level Sam Altman type.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Right im sure the people working adjacent to the DoD have more insight and fears than the people working with the consumer facing models… Again what motive does a young kid have for quitting the company and going on a media tour?

            • TronBronson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Absolutely do no believe he had a sentient AI back then or now. I’m not talking about a thing with feelings. They don’t need sentience to pursue and complete objectives, they dont need sentience to self-preserve or self improve. I’m more concerned about a rogue instance that’s just doing what it was told to do autonomously. Perhaps upgrading itself while it attempts to gain access to launch codes. I’m concerned that a well financed terrorist org can spin up bioweapons. Like I am not taking the AI labs at their words, I am speaking from my experience as a explorer of the technology. I’m thinking about the path from ChatGPT to the newest model, and how they will look in 2 years when more data centers are online and the limitations on training and teaching slowly disappear.